Article View: comp.arch
Article #22074SparcStations vs. Sun 3s!
From: Arun Kandappan
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1990 15:54
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1990 15:54
26 lines
1362 bytes
1362 bytes
I have a question as to the merits of going in for a Sun 3 as opposed to a SparcStaion for a site. The configuraton consists of 3 Suns and 4 PC-ATs with the Suns serving as file servers for the AT as well as development units. 1. Other than compatibility with 680x0, is there any reason to go in for Sun3s rather than SparcStations ? 2. Do gcc, gdb and g++ run reliably on the SparcStation ? 3. I heard from someone(read rumor) that Sun 3 performance is better than SparcStation performance when more than 4/5 processes(applications) are involved. I know this is very nebulous, but any feedback from real users would help. 4. SparcStations are supposed to boot from the internal SCSI drive. Is it possible to order a SS without this drive and use a different vendor's drive to boot from ? Has it been done ? If I get enough replies I will summarise. Thanks Arun Kandappan -- Arun Kandappan arunk@cs.utexas.edu 512+345-1616 EE Dept, UT at Austin TX 78712 uunet!cs.utexas.edu!arunk
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<140@qt.cs.utexas.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!arunkShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!arunk From: arunk@cs.utexas.edu (Arun Kandappan) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: SparcStations vs. Sun 3s! Keywords: SparcStation Sun3 Message-ID: <140@qt.cs.utexas.edu> Date: 12 Jan 90 15:54:58 GMT Organization: University of Texas at Austin Lines: 26