🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #2215

Re: PC vs. mainframe I/O (Re: SCSI on steroids)

#2215
From: Stephen Uitti
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 1989 16:32
64 lines
3759 bytes
In article <1989Sep12.031453.22947@wolves.uucp> ggw@wolves.UUCP (Gregory G. Woodbury) writes:
>In article <21962@cup.portal.com> cliffhanger@cup.portal.com (Cliff C Heyer) writes:
>>Now, on the subject of PCs and disk I/O...
>>What *will* change this though is the emergence of 
>>new low cost chips such as the NCR53C700 SCSI chip...[RAM, etc]

>	We are/have been replacing our dependency on mainframe computing
>by acquiring a network of dedicated, "high performance" (and relatively)
>low cost "PC's".  Some of these things are "workstations", but they all
>use the AT style PC buss, and take too bloody long to do the disk i/o.
>
>It is cheaper (more effective) for us to have...
> ...an 88000 based co-processor in a '386
>33 MHz PC with 1.2 GBytes of disk and 24 MB of memory can cost ~$30,000.
>This is amortizable over several years.
Three years, max.

>The full cost recovery for this
>pc/workstation (assuming 40 hr weeks!) is < $6.00/hour!   The University
>owned (consortium) mainframe limits normal jobs to 5.5MB of memory and costs
>$150.00/hour!   Our application benchmark took ~1 hour to run on the 3081.
>It takes about 1.8 hours to run on the 88000, and costs a hell of a lot less
>'cause there isn't a memory premium overhead on the cost!

I've worked at "University comp centers".  The big cost is not
the hardware.  It is the people.  This is true even when the
machines are huge/expensive.  These centers typically serve many
people with small needs.  They purchase machines that are
extremely cost effective for the work that gets done on them.
They typically don't optimize machines for individual users.
They tend to discourage serious use by charging for hardware
time, rather than charging for the (expensive) administrative
overhead.  The sites i worked at used VAXen, IBMs, etc.  One site
had about 100 pc's (some were macs).  It is cheaper (capital
outlay) to be your own sysop on your own PC.  Most people only do
word processing and a few compiles.  No big deal.  My 4.77 MHz
8088 based PC/XT can do this.  $1000 and you are set for life.
Still, we had users who didn't know how to boot a PC.

If your comp center bought your system for your exclusive use, it
would obviously cost more than $6/hr.  My salary was more than
that.  Ok, so i ran several machines... a big comp center has
lots more overhead.  The comp center will attempt to account for
time on the machine.  Sigh.  If you're lucky, there will be
resources left to grant to users.

I did see one prof get a machine, real cheap.  He then expected
it to run itself.  The OS didn't magically get easier to run just
because the machines was cheap.  When his disk crashed, and no
backups were done, there wasn't a whole lot that anyone could do,
at any price.

Oh, yes, maintenance.  Do you think your PC won't break, being
used 40 hrs/week?  Get a good contract.

If you don't need a sysop, then don't hire one.  If you are the
default sysop, make sure it doesn't take all your time - pay some
attention to the application.

For new and clueless users who don't have a lot of money, buy a
Mac.  Sign up for a maintenance contract.  Maybe take some
classes in word processing.  Or read the manuals...

Stephen.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <14596@haddock.ima.isc.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!ico!ism780c!haddock!suitti
References: <21962@cup.portal.com> <1989Sep12.031453.22947@wolves.uucp>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!ico!ism780c!haddock!suitti
From: suitti@haddock.ima.isc.com (Stephen Uitti)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: PC vs. mainframe I/O (Re: SCSI on steroids)
Message-ID: <14596@haddock.ima.isc.com>
Date: 13 Sep 89 16:32:55 GMT
References: <21962@cup.portal.com> <1989Sep12.031453.22947@wolves.uucp>
Reply-To: suitti@haddock.ima.isc.com (Stephen Uitti)
Organization: Interactive Systems, Cambridge, MA 02138-5302
Lines: 64