🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1991@osc.COM> jgk@osc.COM (Joe Keane) writes:
>>... As far as *technical* issues, the only ones I'm aware of
>>weakly favor big-endian: it's the network standard order, which makes life
>>easier for protocol code,
>
>Isn't this also ``backward compatibility with previous mistakes''?  And what
>about RS-232?

It's a compatibility issue, yes, but it's compatibility with a widespread
standard rather than just with your predecessors' mistakes.

I don't see the relevance of RS232.  Nothing except the UART chips ever
cares about the bit order on the wire; all the computers involved deal
with the data a byte/character at a time.  It's the same way on Ethernet:
the bytes are transmitted a bit at a time, but almost nobody knows or
cares which bit order is used.
-- 
SVR4:  every feature you ever |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
wanted, and plenty you didn't.| uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu