Article View: comp.arch
Article #22187Re: Next computer (Re: CISC Silent Spring)
From: Frank Korzeniewski
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1990 03:00
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1990 03:00
16 lines
934 bytes
934 bytes
In article <8905@portia.Stanford.EDU> underdog@portia.Stanford.EDU (Dwight Joe) writes: > >|<I know. Steve's going to upgrade the NEXT to a 68040. >|<Even then, the Sparc chip set is faster. >| >|How do you know that? Have you benchmarked a 68040? > >source: Businessweek WOW! The definitive source for technical information! I read in EE Times that the 68040 is faster than the Sparc. But after all, what do they know. They are only some technoid rag. Frank Korzeniewski (frk@mtxinu.com)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1119@mtxinu.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mtxinu!frkReferences:
<8905@portia.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mtxinu!frk From: frk@mtxinu.COM (Frank Korzeniewski) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Next computer (Re: CISC Silent Spring) Message-ID: <1119@mtxinu.UUCP> Date: 7 Feb 90 03:00:05 GMT References: <8905@portia.Stanford.EDU> Reply-To: frk@mtxinu.UUCP (Frank Korzeniewski) Followup-To: alt.flame Organization: mt Xinu, Berkeley Lines: 16