Article View: comp.arch
Article #22236Re: NeXT and Multics-bashing
From: Henry Spencer
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1990 16:36
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1990 16:36
16 lines
1286 bytes
1286 bytes
In article <5646@blake.acs.washington.edu> mrc@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (Mark Crispin) writes: >Anyone who claims that "Multics sucked" probably never used Multics or >only used Multics as a casual user. If Multics (or, for that matter, >Tenex) cycles had been available to Dennis Ritchie when he asked for >them, he never would have written Unix. Two corrections: (1) Ken Thompson was the primary author of Unix. (2) At the time when the concept of Unix was first stirring, both had access to Multics cycles, since they were among the last Bell Labs folks involved with Multics. The problem was that those cycles cost far too much and thus were clearly not going to be available forever. (Reference: "The Evolution of the UNIX Time-sharing System", D.M. Ritchie, AT&T Bell Labs Tech Journal, Oct 1984, page 1577.) -- SVR4: every feature you ever | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology wanted, and plenty you didn't.| uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Feb8.163600.22429@utzoo.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henryReferences:
<5646@blake.acs.washington.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.arch Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: NeXT and Multics-bashing Message-ID: <1990Feb8.163600.22429@utzoo.uucp> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology References: <5646@blake.acs.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 90 16:36:00 GMT