Article View: comp.arch
Article #22280Re: Next computer (Re: CISC Silent Spring)
From: Spencer Garrett
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1990 00:44
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1990 00:44
9 lines
974 bytes
974 bytes
In article <486@taniwha.UUCP>, paul@taniwha.UUCP (Paul Campbell) writes: > Look closely at the architecture (try the Byte article), the NeXT board > multiplexes data/addresses from the '030 to make it look like the '040 The '040 does not multiplex address and data lines. The signals coming out of that chip look very much like those of the '030. The 88000, on the other hand, does multiplex addresses and data on its M bus. I'm not familiar with NuBus, so I won't speculate whether this has any bearing on that.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7794@quick.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!uw-entropy!quick!srgReferences:
<8859@portia.Stanford.EDU> <20056@netnews.upenn.edu> <486@taniwha.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!uw-entropy!quick!srg From: srg@quick.COM (Spencer Garrett) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Next computer (Re: CISC Silent Spring) Message-ID: <7794@quick.COM> Date: 9 Feb 90 00:44:37 GMT References: <8859@portia.Stanford.EDU> <20056@netnews.upenn.edu> <486@taniwha.UUCP> Organization: Quicksilver Engineering, Seattle Lines: 9