Re: Next computer (Re: CISC Silent Spring)

Article View: comp.arch

Article #22282

#22282

From: M. Alex Colvin
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1990 01:54

8 lines
781 bytes

since this is the arch group, i'll suggest that multics required computers
with lots'a hardware to run, where unics ran on programmable data
processors.

perhaps the analogy could be to the xerox star, a nifty box that cost too
much, and sold too little.

followup to comp.os.nostalgia

Technical Details

Message-ID: <958@ra.cs.Virginia.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!aplcen!haven!uvaarpa!ra!mac

References: <8859@portia.Stanford.EDU> <20571@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <4801@helios.ee.lbl.gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!aplcen!haven!uvaarpa!ra!mac
From: mac@ra.cs.Virginia.EDU (M. Alex Colvin)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Next computer (Re: CISC Silent Spring)
Summary: multics/unix cynix
Message-ID: <958@ra.cs.Virginia.EDU>
Date: 9 Feb 90 01:54:55 GMT
References: <8859@portia.Stanford.EDU> <20571@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <4801@helios.ee.lbl.gov>
Organization: U.Va. CS Department, Charlottesville, VA
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message