Re: Lisa-IIx ?

Article View: comp.arch

Article #22557

#22557

From: Robert Hammen
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1990 00:56

8 lines
975 bytes

>|   this ever since the MacII came out. The Lisa used a 68000 running
>|   at something like 8Mhz. Now that 68030-based MacII's are in
>|If my memory serves me right I think is was 4.77MHz.
>	No, it was 7.83 MHz, like the Mac.  The IBM PC ran at

Beg to differ. The Lisa was "advertised" to have a 5 MHz 68000 in it. I'm not
sure what the exact speed was (manufacturers tend to round CPU speeds up, in
order to avoid those messy decimal numbers :-)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Feb23.005627.25937@ddsw1.MCS.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!rutgers!mcdchg!ddsw1!hammen

References: <1127@madnix.UUCP> <THOMAS.90Feb21112635@uplog.uplog.se> <3000@cerberus.oakhill.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!rutgers!mcdchg!ddsw1!hammen
From: hammen@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Robert Hammen)
Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Lisa-IIx ?
Message-ID: <1990Feb23.005627.25937@ddsw1.MCS.COM>
Date: 23 Feb 90 00:56:27 GMT
References: <1127@madnix.UUCP> <THOMAS.90Feb21112635@uplog.uplog.se> <3000@cerberus.oakhill.UUCP>
Reply-To: hammen@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Robert Hammen)
Organization: Personal Publishing Magazine
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message