Article View: comp.arch
Article #2297Re: Bandwidth Wasters Hall of Fame for comp.arch
From: Vassilios Axaris
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1989 18:04
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1989 18:04
12 lines
1182 bytes
1182 bytes
I second the opinion expressed that the discussions have been elightening and utterly interesting. Well, I happened to delve into the area of stack machines. I have not seen too much going on, except the RTX 2000. Why is there this lack of interest in the designer community, when the architecture offers some clear advantages when considering code compaction, context switching, and the like? Especially for high level languages that execute around the stack. Any insight will be greatly appreciated. Yours, Vassilios E. Axaris axaris@marvin.cs.buffalo.edu v999nzwr@ubvms.bitnet
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<10732@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!ames!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!pikes!boulder!sunybcs!marvin!axarisReferences:
<13744@well.UUCP> <4186@bd.sei.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!ames!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!pikes!boulder!sunybcs!marvin!axaris From: axaris@cs.buffalo.edu (Vassilios Axaris) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Bandwidth Wasters Hall of Fame for comp.arch Summary: More Bandwidth waste :-) Keywords: Stack, mutlitasking, e.t.c Message-ID: <10732@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> Date: 22 Sep 89 18:04:31 GMT References: <13744@well.UUCP> <4186@bd.sei.cmu.edu> Sender: nobody@acsu.buffalo.edu Reply-To: axaris@cs.buffalo.edu (Vassilios Axaris) Distribution: na Organization: SUNY @ Buffalo Lines: 12