🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #23088

Re: GPL and NDAs

#23088
From: Jeffrey B. Siegal
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:00
30 lines
3016 bytes
Isaac wrote:
> The question is whether or not placing binaries on company
> computers and allowing the employee to then run does or does not
> have consequences under the GPL.   

Actually, I think that is a poor (and loaded) phrasing of the question.  

Are employees allowed to copy the binaries?  (In many cases, they are.) If so,
then this is treated completely differently from running them by GPL, so the
focus on running is a distraction.  Also, allowing an employee to run binaries
on a single computer does not look particularly like distribution; installing
those binaries on a large number of computers throughout an organization looks
a lot more like distribution.  

In reality this is simply one of many cases where the GPL is vague and
ambiguous.  There is no and will never be any clear answer until either
someone litigates or GPL is rewritten.

> Have you expressed an opinion one way or another on this question?

I have expressed doubts about the validity of NDA's as applied to GPLed
softawre and have argued the point, but I really don't have a solid opinion on
this.

> Ownership may not be essential, but certainly when ownership changes
> there can be no question that distribution has taken place.

Hmm.  I'm not sure that's true but I haven't thought about it much.  Since I
doubt that the whole "transfer of ownership" concept is particularly useful,
it probably isn't worth the effort.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <389618B0.38CB3061@quiotix.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <y4902dyklq.fsf@mailhost.neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> <84ga7c$mih$1@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net> <1999Dec30.151712.1@eisner> <386BD144.22362F3A@gmx.de> <o5wvpubn8g.fsf@tofu.to.cygnus.com> <386E890B.1B191CB@gmx.de> <o5iu1bnlr9.fsf@toenail.to.cygnus.com> <3871419C.7D23AE72@gmx.de> <38805954.BC45E825@quiotix.com> <qhu2kefjv0.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <38819C4C.BD383DFD@quiotix.com> <qh7lha9fms.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <38839E3D.22DE182E@gmx.de> <qhwvp8paaw.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <388F8A3B.19C57187@home.com> <86pjhm$crf$1@justus.ecc.lu> <m2k8kryeac.fsf@barnowl.demon.co.uk> <871va3$dm3$1@pyrite.mv.net> <3894AE0F.7DD7547C@quiotix.com> <3894EB2B.EC6F5A45@home.com> <389540A7.6012E51F@quiotix.com> <slrn89b8nb.4u.isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> <3895A4CD.F8E08937@quiotix.com> <slrn89c420.62.isaac@latveria.castledoom.org>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 102b75,6e7c0786c7ba904e
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b75,public
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,92d97b78a13510de
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
From: "Jeffrey B. Siegal" <jbs@quiotix.com>
Subject: Re: GPL and NDAs
Date: 2000/01/31
Message-ID: <389618B0.38CB3061@quiotix.com>
X-Deja-AN: 580099772
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <y4902dyklq.fsf@mailhost.neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> <84ga7c$mih$1@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net> <1999Dec30.151712.1@eisner> <386BD144.22362F3A@gmx.de> <o5wvpubn8g.fsf@tofu.to.cygnus.com> <386E890B.1B191CB@gmx.de> <o5iu1bnlr9.fsf@toenail.to.cygnus.com> <3871419C.7D23AE72@gmx.de> <38805954.BC45E825@quiotix.com> <qhu2kefjv0.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <38819C4C.BD383DFD@quiotix.com> <qh7lha9fms.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <38839E3D.22DE182E@gmx.de> <qhwvp8paaw.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <388F8A3B.19C57187@home.com> <86pjhm$crf$1@justus.ecc.lu> <m2k8kryeac.fsf@barnowl.demon.co.uk> <871va3$dm3$1@pyrite.mv.net> <3894AE0F.7DD7547C@quiotix.com> <3894EB2B.EC6F5A45@home.com> <389540A7.6012E51F@quiotix.com> <slrn89b8nb.4u.isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> <3895A4CD.F8E08937@quiotix.com> <slrn89c420.62.isaac@latveria.castledoom.org>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net
X-Trace: nnrp3-w.snfc21.pbi.net 949360816 63.198.99.82 (Mon, 31 Jan 2000 15:20:16 PST)
Organization: SBC Internet Services
MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 15:20:16 PST
Newsgroups: comp.arch,gnu.misc.discuss