Re: GPL and NDAs

Article View: comp.arch

Article #23290

#23290

From: Richard Watts
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:00

16 lines
1330 bytes

In article <3884E125.1CC4FAC7@quiotix.com>,
Jeffrey B. Siegal <jbs@quiotix.com> wrote:
>Richard Watts wrote:
>>  FWIW, I reckon it's not distribution, it is copying, it is covered
>> by section 6, and since the company is distributing to itself, no
>> obligation to employees, agents, or in fact anyone else is acquired.
>
>Section 6 covers only distribution.  Section 3 (and 4) covers copying of
>executables.

 Good point :-) - thanks... e/6/3 and 4/.
 
 
Richard.
-- 
Principles are things that everyone thinks everyone else should have.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <862nla$o53$1@rrw1000.sel.cam.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<y4902dyklq.fsf@mailhost.neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> <85vkmf$jhq$1@pyrite.mv.net> <86253u$egh$1@rrw1000.sel.cam.ac.uk> <3884E125.1CC4FAC7@quiotix.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 102b75,6e7c0786c7ba904e
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b75,public
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,92d97b78a13510de
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
From: rrw1000@cus.cam.ac.uk (Richard Watts)
Subject: Re: GPL and NDAs
Date: 2000/01/18
Message-ID: <862nla$o53$1@rrw1000.sel.cam.ac.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 574412959
Sender: rrw@rrw1000.sel.cam.ac.uk
References: <y4902dyklq.fsf@mailhost.neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> <85vkmf$jhq$1@pyrite.mv.net> <86253u$egh$1@rrw1000.sel.cam.ac.uk> <3884E125.1CC4FAC7@quiotix.com>
Organization: epona (really rrw1000.sel.cam.ac.uk), a student-run Linux box
Newsgroups: comp.arch,gnu.misc.discuss
Originator: [jFWMSnx7P3nufXT6EkJhQEaKQVkA0b6f]@epona.ucam.org ([131.111.129.173])

Reply to Parent Message