Re: Bandwidth Wasters Hall of Fame for comp.arch

Article View: comp.arch

Article #2335

#2335

From: Cliff C Heyer
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1989 02:05

16 lines
1086 bytes

There must be some error in the 
bandwidth waste calculation algorithm.
I added up 32KB I've posted in Sept, in which
case I'd be in first place. But according
to the post, I posted only 8.5KB at
7th place. 

(You might be thinking of the above
as tongue-in-cheek, but it's not!)

A quick scan of the bandwidth waster
list shows ALL the writers in comp.arch.
Which would lead one to conclude that the
title "wasters" is tongue-in-cheek. You
folks that thought otherwise, think before
you post!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <22536@cup.portal.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!cliffhanger

References:

<13744@well.UUCP> <4186@bd.sei.cmu.edu> <10732@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> <125156@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <11539@burdvax.PRC.Unisys.COM> <27460@amdcad.AMD.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!cliffhanger
From: cliffhanger@cup.portal.com (Cliff C Heyer)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Wasters Hall of Fame for comp.arch
Message-ID: <22536@cup.portal.com>
Date: 26 Sep 89 02:05:09 GMT
References: <13744@well.UUCP> <4186@bd.sei.cmu.edu>
  <10732@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> <125156@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
  <11539@burdvax.PRC.Unisys.COM> <27460@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Distribution: na
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message