Article View: comp.arch
Article #2637Re: 1Meg DRAM supply voltage
From: Henry Spencer
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1989 15:46
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1989 15:46
20 lines
1540 bytes
1540 bytes
In article <6797@hubcap.clemson.edu> rchampe@hubcap.clemson.edu (Richard Champeaux) writes: >I remember a while ago when they were developing 1 Meg DRAMS, they said >that they had to be run off of 3.3v supplies to reduce power dissapation... This is one of these "gonna have to make big changes real soon now" claims that keeps running around, and keeps getting shot down when people discover that it's cost-effective to work *really hard* to avoid the pain of making such changes. Other such claims are "gonna have to drop silicon and go to gallium arsenide real soon now", "gonna have to go to highly-parallel machines to get any further speed increase real soon now", and "gonna have to drop optical lithography and go to electron beams or X-rays real soon now". (One of the gems of my collection is an unintentionally-hilarious paper from an IEEE conference proceedings that proves, in some detail, that it is impossible to build 64Kb DRAMs with optical lithography.) "Gonna have to go to 3.3V for the next generation of memories" has been around for fifteen years or so. -- A bit of tolerance is worth a | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology megabyte of flaming. | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1989Oct17.154651.16073@utzoo.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henryReferences:
<6797@hubcap.clemson.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.arch Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: 1Meg DRAM supply voltage Message-ID: <1989Oct17.154651.16073@utzoo.uucp> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology References: <6797@hubcap.clemson.edu> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 89 15:46:51 GMT