linpack

Article View: comp.arch

Article #2661

#2661

From: Preston Briggs
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1989 08:23

13 lines
962 bytes

In article <9079@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> kahn@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu writes:

>Throw away ALL your copies of the LINPACK 100x100 benchmark if you
>are interested in supercomputers.  The 300x300 is barely big enough

Danny Sorenson mentioned recently that linpack is sort of intended
to show how *bad* a computer can be.  The sizes are kept
deliberately small so that the vector machines barely have a chance
to get rolling.

So, big if you're optimistic; small otherwise.

Preston Briggs

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2203@brazos.Rice.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!rice!titan!preston

References: <35825@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> <127@csinc.UUCP> <9079@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!rice!titan!preston
From: preston@titan.rice.edu (Preston Briggs)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: linpack
Message-ID: <2203@brazos.Rice.edu>
Date: 18 Oct 89 08:23:46 GMT
References: <35825@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> <127@csinc.UUCP> <9079@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>
Sender: root@rice.edu
Reply-To: preston@titan.rice.edu (Preston Briggs)
Organization: Rice University, Houston
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message