Re: 1Meg DRAM supply voltage

Article View: comp.arch

Article #2671

#2671

From: Eric S. Raymond
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1989 20:39

8 lines
869 bytes

In <1989Oct17.154651.16073@utzoo.uucp> Henry Spencer wrote:
> (One of the gems of my collection is an unintentionally-hilarious paper
> from an IEEE conference proceedings that proves, in some detail, that it
> is impossible to build 64Kb DRAMs with optical lithography.)

O.K., now please tell us which limiting assumption went wrong and why.
-- 
      Eric S. Raymond = eric@snark.uu.net    (mad mastermind of TMN-Netnews)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1T9NpG#464lr4=eric@snark.uu.net>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ginosko!uunet!cbmvax!snark!eric

References: <6797@hubcap.clemson.edu> <1989Oct17.154651.16073@utzoo.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ginosko!uunet!cbmvax!snark!eric
From: eric@snark.uu.net (Eric S. Raymond)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: 1Meg DRAM supply voltage
Message-ID: <1T9NpG#464lr4=eric@snark.uu.net>
Date: 18 Oct 89 20:39:06 GMT
References: <6797@hubcap.clemson.edu> <1989Oct17.154651.16073@utzoo.uucp>
Lines: 8
Back-References: <1T9Nlc#4Q6wDz=eric@snark.uu.net>

Reply to Parent Message