Re: Dasgupta: What isn't RISC (?)

Article View: comp.arch

Article #2753

#2753

From: Henry Spencer
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1989 04:40

12 lines
952 bytes

In article <29780@obiwan.mips.COM> mark@mips.COM (Mark G. Johnson) writes:
>   >>5.  The use of hardwired rather than microcoded control.
>
>But this precludes Clipper and the i960.

Sounds reasonable to me.  The Clipper became a "RISC" retroactively when
their marketing department discovered the new buzzword, as I recall.  And
one hears rumors that the i960 was originally going to be much more complex
than it is now, and the effects linger in the design.
-- 
A bit of tolerance is worth a  |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
megabyte of flaming.           | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1989Oct22.044030.28506@utzoo.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry

References: <1989Oct19.155752.13028@mentor.com> <29780@obiwan.mips.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.arch
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer)
Subject: Re: Dasgupta: What isn't RISC (?)
Message-ID: <1989Oct22.044030.28506@utzoo.uucp>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
References: <1989Oct19.155752.13028@mentor.com> <29780@obiwan.mips.COM>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 89 04:40:30 GMT

Reply to Parent Message