Article View: comp.arch
Article #2796Re: parallel systems
From: Eugene Brooks
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1989 03:35
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1989 03:35
12 lines
1061 bytes
1061 bytes
In article <20764@usc.edu> vorbrueg@bufo.usc.edu (Jan Vorbrueggen) writes: >Eugene, ever seen a transputer? Overhead for receiving or sending a Yes I have, a group here is trying to use them in a image processing project. >Message forwarding isn't so difficult either. I've read of a system >requiring less than 10 us overhead per through-route (this probably >is for the destination link being available). No interrupt handling >involved here - that part is all handled in hardware. This level of overhead for each hop is completely intolerable. brooks@maddog.llnl.gov, brooks@maddog.uucp
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36662@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!ginosko!xanth!lll-winken!vette!brooksReferences:
<20764@usc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!ginosko!xanth!lll-winken!vette!brooks From: brooks@vette.llnl.gov (Eugene Brooks) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: parallel systems Message-ID: <36662@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> Date: 24 Oct 89 03:35:07 GMT References: <20764@usc.edu> Sender: usenet@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV Reply-To: brooks@maddog.llnl.gov (Eugene Brooks) Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lines: 12