Article View: comp.arch
Article #2837Re: parallel systems
From: Dave Rudolph
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1989 13:29
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1989 13:29
12 lines
1142 bytes
1142 bytes
In article <36662@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> brooks@maddog.llnl.gov (Eugene Brooks) writes: >In article <20764@usc.edu> vorbrueg@bufo.usc.edu (Jan Vorbrueggen) writes: >>Message forwarding isn't so difficult either. I've read of a system >>requiring less than 10 us overhead per through-route (this probably >>is for the destination link being available). No interrupt handling >>involved here - that part is all handled in hardware. >This level of overhead for each hop is completely intolerable. And what is the overhead for each interconnect level in a "shared memory" machine such as the ultracomputer? Keep in mind that in such a machine, every non-local memory access must go through each level and back while the processor waits.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<224@dg.dg.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!ginosko!uunet!dg!daverReferences:
<20764@usc.edu> <36662@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!ginosko!uunet!dg!daver From: daver@dg.dg.com (Dave Rudolph) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: parallel systems Message-ID: <224@dg.dg.com> Date: 25 Oct 89 13:29:32 GMT References: <20764@usc.edu> <36662@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> Reply-To: uunet!dg!daver (David Rudolph) Organization: Data General, Westboro, MA. Lines: 12