Re: specmarks

Article View: comp.arch

Article #2876

#2876

From: Shahin Kahn
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 1989 07:40

5 lines
797 bytes

In article <4420015@hpihoah.HP.COM> fotland@hpihoah.HP.COM (David Fotland) writes:
>You could define an architectural figure of merit as Specmark/Clock freq.

You should also include compiler quality somehow.  A good architecture
with a lousy code generator shouldn't get a bad mark for architecture.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9171@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!kahn

References: <327@ssp1.idca.tds.philips.nl> <4420015@hpihoah.HP.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!kahn
From: kahn@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu (Shahin Kahn)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: specmarks
Message-ID: <9171@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>
Date: 28 Oct 89 07:40:34 GMT
References: <327@ssp1.idca.tds.philips.nl> <4420015@hpihoah.HP.COM>
Reply-To: kahn@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu (Shahin Kahn)
Organization: Cornell Theory Center, Cornell University, Ithaca NY
Lines: 5

Reply to Parent Message