🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #3191

Re: What CMOS cannot do (Re: Surges)

#3191
From: Tom Shott
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1989 15:49
20 lines
1421 bytes
Another advantage to BiCMOS over those listed is:

5. Schottky clamp diodes (reduced ringing).

I have heard system designers say they would sell their soul for a process
that would just allow Schottky clamp diodes.

You can design a CMOS driver w/ a low voltage swing, controlled edge rates
and fairly high drive (not as high as BiCMOS but..). No question it burns
area, but then area is cheap (cheaper then a new process, any body know how
many more steps a BiCMOS process has over a CMOS process ? Steps cost money
and reduce yield).


--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Shott    INTeL, 2111 NE 25th Ave., Hillsboro, OR 97123, (503) 696-4520
	     toms@omews44.intel.com OR toms%omews44.intel.com@csnet.relay.com
	INTeL.. Designers of the 960 Superscalar uP and other uP's
Technical Details
Message-ID: <TOMS.89Nov28104953@omews44.intel.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!usc!apple!oliveb!mipos3!omepd!toms
References: <7000@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <31547@hal.mips.COM> <48393@bbn.COM> <7032@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <19882@weitek.WEITEK.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!usc!apple!oliveb!mipos3!omepd!toms
From: toms@omews44.intel.com (Tom Shott)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: What CMOS cannot do (Re: Surges)
Message-ID: <TOMS.89Nov28104953@omews44.intel.com>
Date: 28 Nov 89 15:49:53 GMT
References: <7000@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <31547@hal.mips.COM> <48393@bbn.COM>
 <7032@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <19882@weitek.WEITEK.COM>
Sender: news@omepd.UUCP
Organization: OME, INTeL Corp., Hillsboro, Oregon
Lines: 20
In-reply-to: weaver@weitek.WEITEK.COM's message of 20 Nov 89 18:35:10 GMT