Article View: comp.arch
Article #3227GaAs considered dead , indium phosphide, rod logic?
From: Kenneth Ng
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1989 20:16
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1989 20:16
18 lines
1341 bytes
1341 bytes
In article <1Tcfjq#9jMTbv=eric@snark.uu.net>, eric@snark.uu.net (Eric S. Raymond) writes: : If you're the gambling type, bet your bux on ballistic-transistor technology : or indium phosphide or even nanotechnology rod logic. But forget GaAs. It is : almost certainly doomed to remain a niche technology funded by organizations : that don't care how much of your money they spend for their fun. Hm, indium phosphide I once heard that mentioned by Cray (yes that Cray), but I never heard of nanotechnology rod logic. Is it real or is it a joke of some kind? Does anyone know of anyone working with indium phosphide at least? : Eric S. Raymond = eric@snark.uu.net (mad mastermind of TMN-Netnews) -- Kenneth Ng: Post office: NJIT - CCCC, Newark New Jersey 07102 uucp !andromeda!argus!ken *** NOT ken@bellcore.uucp *** bitnet(prefered) ken@orion.bitnet
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1376@argus.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!galaxy.rutgers.edu!argus!kenReferences:
<24317@cup.portal.com> <480@dmk3b1.UUCP> <1Tcfjq#9jMTbv=eric@snark.uu.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!galaxy.rutgers.edu!argus!ken From: ken@argus.UUCP (Kenneth Ng) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: GaAs considered dead , indium phosphide, rod logic? Message-ID: <1376@argus.UUCP> Date: 30 Nov 89 20:16:20 GMT References: <24317@cup.portal.com> <480@dmk3b1.UUCP> <1Tcfjq#9jMTbv=eric@snark.uu.net> Organization: NJ Instit. of Tech: TEIES Project Lines: 18