Re: NEC V80

Article View: comp.arch

Article #3255

#3255

From: Peter da Silva
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 1989 20:25

17 lines
1124 bytes

In article <28388@necntc.nec.com> pec@necntc.nec.com (Paul Cohen) writes:
>   > And the question foremost in everyone's mind... is it an 80386 clone?
>   > 	-- Chuq Von Rospach, chuq@Apple.COM 

That sounds like a question I asked. I'll have to be more careful with
my cute little .signature quotes... because some people are not at all
careful about attributions.

> No! Not at all!  It is NEC's own architecture.

Pity. I'd have liked to pull the replace-the-x86-with-a-NEC-chip trick
again.
-- 
`-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. <peter@ficc.uu.net>.
 'U`  Also <peter@ficc.lonestar.org> or <peter@sugar.lonestar.org>.
"The basic notion underlying USENET is the flame."
	-- Chuq Von Rospach, chuq@Apple.COM

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7186@ficc.uu.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!nuchat!sugar!ficc!peter

References: <2966@taux01.UUCP> <28388@necntc.nec.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!nuchat!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: NEC V80
Message-ID: <7186@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 1 Dec 89 20:25:23 GMT
References: <2966@taux01.UUCP> <28388@necntc.nec.com>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message