Article View: comp.arch
Article #20265Re: Intel/MIPS Dhrystone ratio
From: Hal Hardenbergh
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1989 17:27
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1989 17:27
12 lines
1118 bytes
1118 bytes
In article <15690@cup.portal.com> bcase@cup.portal.com (Brian bcase Case) writes: >anybody remember the newsletter DTACK Grounded ? >>Yes, I do. This is the newletter that printed the *WORST* (most inaccurate) >>assesment of RISC that I have yet read. However, I think it was a letter >>from a reader, and so doesn't necessarily represent the newsletter's position. That letter came in "over the transom," meaning it was not for attribution. The writer worked for Big Blue at the time. Uh, what did you think of Nick Tredennick's assessment of RISC in the Feb issue of Microcomputer Report? Was that the _second_ most inaccurate assessment of RISC that you have yet read?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1562@vicom.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!apple!vsi1!halReferences:
<1552@vicom.COM> <15690@cup.portal.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!apple!vsi1!hal From: hal@vicom.COM (Hal Hardenbergh) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Intel/MIPS Dhrystone ratio Message-ID: <1562@vicom.COM> Date: 13 Mar 89 17:27:16 GMT References: <1552@vicom.COM> <15690@cup.portal.com> Reply-To: hal@vicom.COM (Hal Hardenbergh (236)) Organization: Vicom Systems Inc. San Jose, CA Lines: 12