Article View: comp.arch
Article #2140Re: SRAM vs. DRAM, 33MHz 386 UNIX-PC
From: John Wilkes
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 1989 00:28
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 1989 00:28
24 lines
1379 bytes
1379 bytes
In article <7851@cbmvax.UUCP> daveh@cbmvax.UUCP (Dave Haynie) writes:
>
{talking about flushing the cache}
>MUST between user tasks, since the address spaces are aliased. Caching still
i believe that this is true only for a virtual cache. a physical cache
does not have the aliasing problem.
>> Harvard A.(separate data/instruction cache),
>
>This isn't an advantage as an external cache unless you're CPU has external
>I and D busses. The only one I know of that does is the Motorola 88100. While
not necessarily. you might want your d cache to have a 128-byte line, and
your i cache to have an eight byte line, for example. code references and
data references usually have different access patterns.
doesn't the amd 29000 have external i and d busses? it's been a long time
since i looked at that chip...
--
-wilkes
wilkes@mips.com -OR- {ames, decwrl, pyramid}!mips!wilkes
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<27133@proton.mips.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!apple!voder!pyramid!prls!mips!wilkesReferences:
<21936@cup.portal.com> <7851@cbmvax.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!apple!voder!pyramid!prls!mips!wilkes From: wilkes@mips.COM (John Wilkes) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: SRAM vs. DRAM, 33MHz 386 UNIX-PC Message-ID: <27133@proton.mips.COM> Date: 8 Sep 89 00:28:33 GMT References: <21936@cup.portal.com> <7851@cbmvax.UUCP> Reply-To: wilkes@mips.COM (John Wilkes) Organization: MIPS Computer Systems, Sunnyvale, CA Lines: 24