🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #13223

Re: 64 Vs 32

#13223
From: Scott Dorsey
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1987 17:42
22 lines
1562 bytes
Wayne A. Christopher writes:

>What we need to ask is, who will need more than ~1G of memory?  I think
>the only applications that currently could use this much memory are
>scientific programs that run on Crays (which I think are addressible to
>the 64-bit word anyway).  I certainly haven't been running into the 1G
>limit too often lately.
>
>	Wayne

   "You don't really need 64K.  48K is so much memory that nobody 
    really knows what do with all of it.  " 
                               -- Ithaca Audio Salesman

   "It's possible to upgrade the machine to 640K, but there isn't 
    any software that uses more than 256K"
                               -- IBM PC Salesman
-- 
Scott Dorsey   Kaptain_Kludge
ICS Programming Lab (Where old terminals go to die),  Rich 110,
    Georgia Institute of Technology, Box 36681, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
    ...!{akgua,allegra,amd,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo,ut-ngp}!gatech!gitpyr!kludge
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3302@gitpyr.gatech.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!husc6!linus!gatech!gitpyr!kludge
References: <3810013@nucsrl.UUCP> <985@rpics.RPI.EDU> <1310@ucbcad.berkeley.edu> <782@ames.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!husc6!linus!gatech!gitpyr!kludge
From: kludge@gitpyr.gatech.EDU (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: 64 Vs 32
Message-ID: <3302@gitpyr.gatech.EDU>
Date: Tue, 17-Mar-87 12:42:53 EST
Article-I.D.: gitpyr.3302
Posted: Tue Mar 17 12:42:53 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Mar-87 00:46:05 EST
References: <3810013@nucsrl.UUCP> <985@rpics.RPI.EDU> <1310@ucbcad.berkeley.edu> <782@ames.UUCP>
Reply-To: kludge@gitpyr.UUCP (Scott Dorsey)
Organization: Georgia College Of Universal Knowledge
Lines: 22