Re: 8086 design goals (and Pascal)

Article View: comp.arch

Article #21343

#21343

From: Peter da Silva
Date: Thu, 18 May 1989 13:58

10 lines
957 bytes

One thing I don't understand in this discussion... what feature of Pascal
made them think no object should ever be larger than 64K? It's this 64K limit
that's the main problem in the 8086 family... the segments themselves are
a relatively minor problem. Even for 'C' there's no rule against , or real
difficulty with, putting one object (or at most a few objects) in a segment.
-- 
Peter da Silva, Xenix Support, Ferranti International Controls Corporation.

Business: uunet.uu.net!ficc!peter, peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180.
Personal: ...!texbell!sugar!peter, peter@sugar.hackercorp.com.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4230@ficc.uu.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ficc!peter

References: <912@aber-cs.UUCP> <3312@bd.sei.cmu.edu> <362@verdix.verdix.com> <15766@vail.ICO.ISC.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: 8086 design goals (and Pascal)
Message-ID: <4230@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 18 May 89 13:58:49 GMT
References: <912@aber-cs.UUCP> <3312@bd.sei.cmu.edu> <362@verdix.verdix.com> <15766@vail.ICO.ISC.COM>
Organization: Xenix Support
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message