Re: Prisma is gone

Article View: comp.arch

Article #3104

#3104

From: David Keaton
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1989 08:01

15 lines
938 bytes

In article <24317@cup.portal.com> mslater@cup.portal.com (Michael Z Slater) writes:
>I've hear from a few sources now that Prisma, which was attempting to
>build a gallium arsenide SPARC machine, has had their plug pulled by
>the VCs.  Anyone know what happened?  Does this have implications for
>SPARC's "scalability" argument, or were the problems independent of
>SPARC?
>
>Michael Slater, Microprocessor Report   mslater@cup.portal.com

     The problems were related to technology and funding.  They were
independent of SPARC.
--
					David Keaton
					dmk%dmk3b1@uunet.uu.net
					uunet!dmk3b1!dmk

Technical Details

Message-ID: <480@dmk3b1.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!dmk3b1!dmk

References: <24317@cup.portal.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!dmk3b1!dmk
From: dmk@dmk3b1.UUCP (David Keaton)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Prisma is gone
Message-ID: <480@dmk3b1.UUCP>
Date: 22 Nov 89 08:01:12 GMT
References: <24317@cup.portal.com>
Reply-To: dmk@dmk3b1.UUCP (David Keaton)
Organization: DMK, Colorado Springs, CO
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message