Re: 64 Vs 32

Article View: comp.arch

Article #13187

#13187

From: yerazuws
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1987 13:58

19 lines
1337 bytes

In article <3810013@nucsrl.UUCP>, ram@nucsrl.UUCP (Raman Renu) writes:
> 
>      As the 32-bit CPU is everywhere, is the mini-class of machines 
> moving towards 64 bit?.  In a decade we have seen the migration from 
> 4->8->16->32.  Would there be a 64-bit micro-processor soon?

Yep.  Consider- it's now a standard configuration for VAX 8800's
to come with 512 megs of memory (I've got the part number around
somewhere).  A VAX has 32 bits- so if we assume (*) that all 32
can be used as memory address, a VAX (or other 32-bit processor)
can have AT MOST 4 GIG of memory.

If available memory continues to double every 18 months, we have
about 3.5 doubling periods left, or about 5 years.

   (*) assumptions like this are never valid.
-- 
	-Bill Yerazunis "VAXstation Repo Man"
-->Copyright 1987. Restricted Redistribution via Stargate PROHIBITED <--

Technical Details

Message-ID: <985@rpics.RPI.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!rpics!yerazuws

References: <3810013@nucsrl.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!rpics!yerazuws
From: yerazuws@rpics.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: 64 Vs 32
Message-ID: <985@rpics.RPI.EDU>
Date: Fri, 13-Mar-87 08:58:02 EST
Article-I.D.: rpics.985
Posted: Fri Mar 13 08:58:02 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Mar-87 15:06:59 EST
References: <3810013@nucsrl.UUCP>
Lines: 19
Summary: Yep.  64-bit is on the way.

Reply to Parent Message