🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <RYAN.91Jun19141831@ra.cs.umb.edu> ryan@ra.cs.umb.edu (Daniel R. Guilderson) writes:
>we should be discussing ways which we could distribute the work load
>as widely as possible so that noone person is overly burdened.  For
>example, whenever we find ourselves posting the location and/or
>availability of an item of information or software, it would be nice
>if there was a single newsgroup with an agreed upon article format
>which one could post that info to.  It would be bad manners to carry
>on discussion in the designated newsgroup.  That's just one idea.
>Maybe it will work, maybe not, but I think it is a better idea than
>having one person or one company sifting through megabytes of crap to
>find a few gems.

I prefer a cooperation between N assistant-moderators, who
lurk/contribute across the span of newsgroups.  It would be the
responsibility of these persons to clip articles which point to
archives, and mail them (including original Message-ID) to the
master-moderator.

The master-moderator would post the clippings, taking care not to post
duplicates.  Master-moderator could be automatic.

I volunteer, effective immediately, to forward clippings from 
    comp.sys.3b1
    comp.sources.3b1
to the current moderator of comp.archives.  I accept the responsibility
of finding a replacement if I decide to no longer read these newsgroups.

(I will cease this assistance if (i) someone points out how foolishly I
have overlooked something, or (ii) emv asks me to quit polluting his
mailbox)

Best Regards,
ruck
-- 
John R Ruckstuhl, Jr			ruck@alpha.ee.ufl.edu
Dept of Electrical Engineering		ruck@cis.ufl.edu, uflorida!ruck
University of Florida