Article View: comp.archives.msdos.d
Article #624Re: Are there better versions of my old DOS tools?
From: Oz
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 00:00
20 lines
1576 bytes
1576 bytes
In article <864382476snz@hamil.demon.co.uk>, Peter Hamilton
<peter@hamil.demon.co.uk> writes
>In article <fRf6mFAmXNhzEwON@colskip.demon.co.uk>
> colskip@colskip.demon.co.uk "Colin Smith." writes:
>
>> Certainly your Xtree is old in the tooth I use 4.5 for dos, and Norton
>
>I use XTree v3.0 for dos and think it's brilliant.
Oh dear. I sill use X-Tree pro (V1). OK it's old, but it's very small
and you can usually shell out of even a dos prog and still use it. The
only gripe I have is that the numeric keyboard (.) doesn't work.
Some things are so simple and straightforward they really don't need
advancement cos, well, that's all you need.
--
'Oz "Is it better to seem ignorant and learn,
- or seem wise and stay ignorant?"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<SJCX0CA4UahzEwer@upthorpe.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<864309647snz@microvest.demon.co.uk> <fRf6mFAmXNhzEwON@colskip.demon.co.uk> <864382476snz@hamil.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,5dba85b8e567d1d0 X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public X-Google-Thread: 111d31,5dba85b8e567d1d0 X-Google-Attributes: gid111d31,public X-Google-Thread: f71eb,5dba85b8e567d1d0 X-Google-Attributes: gidf71eb,public From: Oz <Oz@upthorpe.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Are there better versions of my old DOS tools? Date: 1997/05/23 Message-ID: <SJCX0CA4UahzEwer@upthorpe.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 243361522 Distribution: world X-NNTP-Posting-Host: upthorpe.demon.co.uk [158.152.116.64] References: <864309647snz@microvest.demon.co.uk> <fRf6mFAmXNhzEwON@colskip.demon.co.uk> <864382476snz@hamil.demon.co.uk> Organization: Oz Reply-To: Oz@upthorpe.demon.co.uk Newsgroups: comp.archives.msdos.d,comp.os.msdos.misc,demon.tech.pc