Article View: comp.archives
Article #5532Re: DB:ADD SITE gatekeeper.dec.com
From: T. William Wells
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 1988 03:29
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 1988 03:29
56 lines
2798 bytes
2798 bytes
In article <12512@steinmetz.ge.com> davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes:
: In article <133@twwells.uucp> comparc@twwells.uucp (comp.archives) writes:
: | @ADD SITE
: | NM gatekeeper.dec.com
: | EN vixie@decwrl.dec.com (Paul A. Vixie) Tue Oct 25 14:17:17 PDT 1988
: | AD vixie@decwrl.dec.com (Paul A. Vixie)
: | MA 100 Hamilton Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94301
: | CO ftp;ftp;gatekeeper.dec.com;128.45.9.52;/pub;0000-2359
: | DE Gatekeeper is DEC's anonymous FTP machine. Lots of interesting things
: | DE show up here, including the latest version of anything having to do with
: | DE X Windows.
: |
: | @END
:
: A few comments about this format before the database gets out of hand.
: I would like to see a "keywords" field in these, in which some of the
: major areas covered would be detailed. In the above, for instance, a
: line of the form
: KW X-Windows
: KW X Windows
: would assist searching. I'm just starting to look at software to support
: this stuff, and I will be leaving space for this, even if I have to
: enter it myself.
You have a good idea. Consider it added to the database format. The
new line is comprised of the letters KW, followed by a semicolon
separated list of keywords. Spaces, other than the first, are optional
and ignored.
: It would also be useful to have a line describing the name(s) of files
: containing the current contents listing. Perhaps an archive index entry
: such as:
: IX /pub/index
Another good idea. However, I think it should be a little more
general. Suppose that gatekeeper has an index in /pub/INDEX. The
index line should look like:
IX ftp;INDEX;1988 Oct 25;;index of /pub
In other words, it would look like an entry of the content database,
except that it is missing the first three fields and has an IX
prepended.
: A lot of us didn't get the "welcome to" message, and I may be missing a
: lot of details by reverse engineering the purpose of this group from
: replies to the original message, but I suspect I'm not alone. In a new
: group messages sometimes get expired before the group gets made
: downstream in the feed.
Don't worry about that. I am going to be reposting it shortly, updated
with the modifications that I have decided to adopt.
---
Bill
{uunet|novavax}!proxftl!twwells!bill
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<146@twwells.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!husc6!ukma!uflorida!novavax!proxftl!twwells!billReferences:
<133@twwells.uucp> <12512@steinmetz.ge.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!husc6!ukma!uflorida!novavax!proxftl!twwells!bill From: bill@twwells.uucp (T. William Wells) Newsgroups: comp.archives Subject: Re: DB:ADD SITE gatekeeper.dec.com Message-ID: <146@twwells.uucp> Date: 4 Nov 88 03:29:46 GMT References: <133@twwells.uucp> <12512@steinmetz.ge.com> Reply-To: bill@twwells.UUCP (T. William Wells) Organization: None, Ft. Lauderdale Lines: 56 Approved: bill@twwells.uucp (T. William Wells)