🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <8811140743.AA28543@ernie.Berkeley.EDU> andy@ernie.Berkeley.EDU (Andrew Purshottam) writes:
: I have been collecting info on snarfable codes for several years
: and have big pile of mail messages and notes indicating archive sites.

Drool, drool. Pant, pant. :-)

: However, many of the smaller arch sites, particularly those
: part of a univ research group will never get around to making
: a proper ca posting. Would you care for either (1) raw postings
: of original mail messages announcing a snarfable source; (2)
: ca-format entries for such? (2) stuff would come at a *much*
: slower rate, of course.

Yes, I'd definitely like to have them. And I'd vastly prefer them
preformatted. You see, there is no real way that I will be able to
make a practice of formatting them myself, simply because there are
*so* many archive sites, and I have *so* little spare time. Feel free
to send tham *slowly*, that means that I can take my time to check
them over before posting them. The one thing I really have to watch
out for is getting flooded out.

---
Bill
{uunet|novavax}!proxftl!twwells!bill

send comp.archives postings to twwells!comp-archives
send comp.archives related mail to twwells!comp-archives-request