Article View: comp.bbs.misc
Article #219Re: Searchlight (Bidirectional Flame)
From: Doc
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 17:54
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 17:54
57 lines
3344 bytes
3344 bytes
fnord@panix.com (Cliff Heller) writes: >>2) Many people hate Searchlight. >one person hates Searchlight. Get a life, fnord. If you think Im the only one you are ignorant indeed. >The Message Threading on Searchlight is superior to any product on the >market. When a message comes up, there is an indicator of the number of >replies to it. You can read these replies without losing your place. You >can jump up the thread, or across the thread very easily. Message threading on SL is totally confusing. I have yet to figure out the difference between "Top" and "Original" message, or "Next" and "Sequential". Im sure fnord will now diligently explain the differences to me, and tell me how simple it really is (to him) but the fact remains that it is confusing to new users. Hell its confusing to old users! And there is no online help which explains it satisfactorily, or even in the manual. SL once again leaves you in the dark. >The decision was made not to incorporate such information because >1) it rapidly fills up disk space and How nice to know that Frank made that choice for you, instead of leaving it up to you. Frankie knows best? I dont think so..... >2) it is contrary to the author's philosophy of BBSing. That is Frank >didn't really go for "The Sysop as big brother" Yes, and along with that philosophy, SL doesnt even let the sysop see the users' passwords. A sorry "feature" indeed. That says "well we dont trust you and we think that you might share your users' passwords with other sysops so you arent allowed to see." So when a user forgets his password and asks you what it is, you look like an idiot having to tell him "I dont know, I can only reset it for you." >From what I gathered from our sole major vocal opponent of Searchlight in >private e-mail transactions, the problem is that after the first major >upgrade, they cost $25. (This naturally excludes maintenence releases) Dont even think that I am alone in this fnord, Im just the only SL sysop who doesnt like it AND who happens to read this group AND has the motivation to speak up about it. The fact is that the =majority= of SL sysops I know would not buy it again. The fact that they dont have internet access or dont read this group or just dont care to get involved in this debate doesnt mean theyre not out there. By the way, the upgrades cost $30, not $25. If you want a diskette mailed to you, you can add another 6 bucks on top of that. For that $6 you get a 720K diskette that has been hole-punched and formatted to 1.44M, and a floppy mailer with $.65 postage on it. You wanted facts, those are facts. Opinion is still the same, Searchlight sucks!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bs41qE.1Hy@news.cso.uiuc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!jvmg9796References:
<1992Jul25.172208.9598@panix.com> <BryuL1.5A2@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Jul26.043116.9215@ncsu.edu> <1992Jul26.195127.24773@klic.rain.com> <1992Jul28.011055.16431@panix.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!jvmg9796 From: jvmg9796@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Doc) Newsgroups: comp.bbs.misc Subject: Re: Searchlight (Bidirectional Flame) Message-ID: <Bs41qE.1Hy@news.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: 28 Jul 92 17:54:13 GMT References: <1992Jul25.172208.9598@panix.com> <BryuL1.5A2@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Jul26.043116.9215@ncsu.edu> <1992Jul26.195127.24773@klic.rain.com> <1992Jul28.011055.16431@panix.com> Sender: usenet@news.cso.uiuc.edu (Net Noise owner) Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Lines: 57