Article View: comp.bbs.misc
Article #239Re: Searchlight (Bidirectional Flame)
From: Daniel P. Peck
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 19:32
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 19:32
11 lines
1233 bytes
1233 bytes
Just because a BBS is not used by sysops in a certain area, does not mean it is no good. (I know, you never said that, either) I find that, usually, in any given area, a certain type of BBS catches on more than another. But, also, I've seen that SearchLight has, with a little time and effort (or a lot!) great configurability. My BBS is not at ALL like it was when I first got it. I've still kept most of the way it operates, but if I wanted to, I could create a whole new BBS that is unique to any other. All the others I've used seem to be so much the same. In a way that's good, but in others, it gets boring. Anyway, just thought I'd add a few words, here, too. :) -- Dan
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul30.193221.12914@lonex.rl.af.mil>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!awds.imsd.contel.com!wlbr!lonex.rl.af.mil!peckdReferences:
<Bs41qE.1Hy@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Jul29.130105.6561@lonex.rl.af.mil> <1992Jul29.163407.26806@ncsu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!awds.imsd.contel.com!wlbr!lonex.rl.af.mil!peckd From: peckd@lonexc.rl.af.mil (Daniel P. Peck) Subject: Re: Searchlight (Bidirectional Flame) Message-ID: <1992Jul30.193221.12914@lonex.rl.af.mil> Sender: usenet@lonex.rl.af.mil (USENET Account) Nntp-Posting-Host: lonexc.rl.af.mil Organization: RL References: <Bs41qE.1Hy@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Jul29.130105.6561@lonex.rl.af.mil> <1992Jul29.163407.26806@ncsu.edu> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 92 19:32:21 GMT Lines: 13