🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Bt98Ju.1rA@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Matt Hucke) writes:
> I'm having a problem running Binkleyterm (2.50) with a Dallas Fax 14.4k 
> modem.  When in unattended mode, BT will not recognize the "ring" signals
> sent by the modem, and will therefore never answer the phone... but in
> Terminal mode, the "ring"s appear onscreen.  When exiting unattended mode
> (into terminal mode) after the phone has been ringing, all the "ring"s will
> appear onscreen at once... as if they BT was ignoring the modem before.
> 
> Has anyone else had this problem?  And if you solved it, could you please 
> send me a config file?
> -- 
>    And thither came Conan, a thief, a reaver, a slayer, to tread the jeweled 
>    thrones of the Earth beneath his sandaled feet.  --THE NEMEDIAN CHRONICLES 
> hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu             _V_a_l_h_a_l_l_a BBS, 217-352-3682, WWIV4.21, 14.4k

I have also had the same problem.  However, not with a DALLAS Fax 14.4k modem.

When in Unattended mode, when a caller calls, ring will report on the status
window, but Binkley never answers.  After the number of rings in Binkley.CFG
has been reached, then it hangs up and goes back to waiting.  This was with
version 2.50.  WIth 2.56Beta, it is the same way.  Also, what has happened to
BTCTL.EXE in the packages?  The Beta version I understand is not complete per
the documents.  I don't see the BTCTL program.  I understand and in the past,
have used it to make the necessary files binkley needs, i.e., (MAIL.SYS).

Obviously your modem init strings has the command "V1" as Binkley is reporting
ring versus a numeric response.  What about the S0 register?  Is it set to
S0=0 to allow the software to answer vs the modem?  Yea, I know what you must
be going through, I am going the same rough road...

N5UYH at The HAM Connection BBS (409)833-1795 24 hours