🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug20.012251.121315@zeus.calpoly.edu> cambler@zeus.calpoly.edu (Christopher J. Ambler, Phish) writes:
[...]
>Is there any interest in other comp.bbs.[system] groups? Should they
>be created as necessary, or is a global vote on the most used systems
>a good idea, which will stimulate discussion? (And perhaps help persuade
>manufacturers to get on the Usenet... though from the ONE BBSCON, it
>looks like persuasion isn't needed, and that's in the works anyway).
>
>Please don't email, this is just a public question of interest. If
>there's sufficient interest and no good reason not to, I'll propose
>an RFD at a later date. I'm just wondering if it's a good idea (yet).

Hmmm...  Has its good and bad points.  Good being that one only has to read a
single group to get ideas/support for his/her BBS package.  Bad because of
all the extra groups - (Not that I mind, I already have almost 1300 here, a
few more wont hurt).  Another problem I see is this group has a large
collection of authors and users.  If you split it up, everyone goes back into
their own corners, and doesn't talk to one-another.  Either that, or there 
will be a lot of cross-posting.

>And please, don't start flaming on this. I can just hear the flames now,
>which is why I'm trying very hard to be diplomatic about the wording here.

Intersting that I use the F key to reply in "rn".  :-)

-- 
Like wow...  This be a .sig, eh? 
GEEKS Anonymous - Join today!
The Source for Source - Pub Access Unix.  (516) 968-7824 or (516) 666-5877