🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.bbs.misc
Article #329

Re: Another WWIV Question...

#329
From: Michael D. Maxfield
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 07:57
18 lines
1565 bytes
In article <1992Aug28.031750.23443@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> cnanayak@nyx.cs.du.edu (Chevan Nanayakkara @ Nyx) writes:
>
>One more question.  How many people have tried the Internet <=> WWIVnet
>gateway for mail?  How long on average does it take for mail to get where
>it's going (I'm sure that's limited by the WWIVnet side with the hops and
>all)?  I'm curious since I sent a letter to myself a week ago and it still
>hasn't arrived.

And a lot of the delay happens on the UUCP side.  A lot of the gateways
around are two or more hops off of the internet.  I have heard stories of
a single day transit from CA to the East coast and back, while in the same
week a message I sent took about five days.  As I was checking out the
header, I noticed that it sat at a UUCP site for a few days.  Probably
a link went down or something.  

I am going to be testing the WWCP gateway software out here in the SF
Bay Area as soon as I get a node number from WWIVnet.  As of now though,
it seems like the quickest gateway for this area (CA) is the Alaska site.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4dfntgc.tweek@netcom.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!tweek
References: <1992Aug26.015118.3460@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <++bnrlp.tweek@netcom.com> <1992Aug28.031750.23443@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!tweek
From: tweek@netcom.com (Michael D. Maxfield)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.misc
Subject: Re: Another WWIV Question...
Keywords: WWIV multi node line
Message-ID: <4dfntgc.tweek@netcom.com>
Date: 29 Aug 92 07:57:15 GMT
References: <1992Aug26.015118.3460@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <++bnrlp.tweek@netcom.com> <1992Aug28.031750.23443@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
Organization: Movement to Ban or Re-Regulate the CABLE MONOPOLIES
Lines: 18