Article View: comp.bbs.misc
Article #382Re: Info Post on Packet Radio.
From: lairdpg
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1992 04:27
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1992 04:27
167 lines
9965 bytes
9965 bytes
In article <18363.2aa646b4@ecs.umass.edu>, pierre@ecs.umass.edu writes: > > > Posted by Xyzzy Markany Tesseract Plugh on 08.10.92: 15.19 > Xyzzy@ai.mit.edu or DanielD@(vax2.)hofstra.edu > Mind Itself > /dev/null == A Mind Itself goes nowhere > > Packet Radio > > Packet radio is a form of amateur radio communications combining radios with > modems. Packet radio uses the features of TCP/IP or AX.25, but using RF signals > instead of telephone or dedicated wires. > > To use packet radio, you must have a valid amateur radio license or an > excellent forgery <grin>. In all seriousness, however, the FCC ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Very illegal! Don't even think of this, you could be one who recieves the 20,000.00 fine and go to prison in the U.S. operating packet without a license... > _does_crack_down_ on people who obviously don't know what they are doing. Once > you have a radio license, you must get a VHF radio. Some radios are well suited > for this purpose; others are not. Usually, because people are really starting > to get into packet radio a lot because of the new NO-CODE radio class, many > radios proudly bear the label 'good for packet radio'. Don't worry, > you _can_ believe that. <:-)>. > > You will also need a device called a TNC (terminal node controller). The best > one is PK-232 (a good one is made by AEA); two other standards are the TNC1 and > TNC2. It connects directly to the 232 port and your radio. The TNC is used to > control the input and output to and from the radio waves. It is in charge of > assembling the actual frames of data. Another item you may or may not need is > a packet radio terminal program. Although you may use a regular program such as > Smartcom or Procomm, this will put you through the needless pain of learning > all of the TNC system commands. The alternative is getting a packet terminal > program that acts as a front end to the TNC. Many good shareware programs have > been written for this purpose. If you get a PK-232, there is a shareware > program called PK232com, which is what I use and it supports packet, morse, > baudot, RTTY, etc. (Morse, baudot, and RTTY are other forms of non-vocal > communication; you don't have to know Morse code to converse in it!) The PK-232 is very outdated. There are many multi-modTNC's on the market today. Research before you buy... > > How Packet Works > > Packet radio originated in the late 1970s, when radio amateurs in Canada > decided that the marriage of the radio and the computer would be a Good Thing. > At that time, a standard for communications was decided on, but it was soon > seen that this format was too limiting to be supportive of many people in the > long term. As hams in the United States got involved in this aspect of radio, > amateurs got togehter and decided on a new, improved format. It was decided > that the new protocol should take after the popular X.25 format. The new format > for radio was named AX.25. This format, still in use, defines the way TNCs > pass information between them. Each TNC, when it sends a block of information, > sends first a header block (sometimes called a supervisory block), then a data > block, then an end block. He doesn't mention KA9Q, does he? (contributions to X.25 Driver and TCPIP) > > Header Block > The header block is used only when on a frequency being used by many people. > (This will usually be the case. However, if you have found a certain person > with whom you wish to chat or exchange files without being in contact with the > rest of the radio network, it is consindered good equiette to move off > frequency so as not to clog the airwaves. When off frequency, header blocks are > not needed as there is only one place where your files are going.) This header > block contains, among other items, your call sign, supervisory information such > as error codes, and addressing information (where you are talking to). > > Data Block > The data block contains the actual data that you are sending. > > End Block > The end block tells the other computers that you are done. Sometimes, the end > block is not used because the data block contains a fixed amount of > information. However, it is good because it can contain a checksum to make sure > everything was sent correctly. > > The header block serves a very important purpose; in most cases many hundreds > of stations will be using the same frequency. This is good. Each and every of > those stations, if configured properly, can act as an intelligent digipeater. > When you send a packet of information to a certain address, you send it out in > all directions. Then, when another station recieves it, it compares the address > with a list in memory and, if it is closer to the target address than others > in the vicinity, it will rebroadcast this packet. (These lists are updated on > powerup by checking what signs are being transmitted.) You yourself will also > be acting as a digipeater for others. (This can be disabled, but there is no > real advantage to doing so.) In this manner, you can transmit around the world, > although if the frequency is crowded, there can be so many packets bouncing > around that it may take almost a second for your packet to reach its target. > > Use > Packet radio is a great way to communicate with other radio operators. Like > morse and RTTY, there is a better chance of your message getting through than > with voice, because it is a completely binary format. However, it is better > than others because if there is a single mistake made in transmitting your > packet, the recieving station will ask for a retransmittance. In this way, no > matter how bad the conditions eventually a error-free packet will get through. > There are many people out there using Packet, (150000+) and each wants to talk > to you. There are even computers out there called PBBSs, which are the radio > equivelent of telephone BBSs, and the packet equivelent of radio repeater clubs. > > Beyond (before?) Packet > Many TNCs are also capable of transmitting and recieving morse, baudot, and > RTTY. The TNC will detect the speed and copy code to normal characters on your > screen and vice versa; you don't need to know a letter of code. This will > usually work perfectly as many others will also be transmitting and recieving > morse with a computer, so there will be no timing errors. You can also > transmit baudot and RTTY, although these are not as popular. > > The New Standard > Although AX.25 is still widely used, an emerging standard in the packet radio > networks is the TCP/IP protocol used in the Internet (THE net). The TCP/IP is > considerably more complex (and accurate) than the AX.25 standard, and will > probably be the standard in a few years. It is important to buy a TNC that > supports this. > > Bad Idea > There are many programs going around called things like "Poor Man's TNC" and > "SofTNC". These are supposidly software TNCs. They work, but very slowly, and > you will soon be seen as an impediment to the network because your link will > slow every packet sent through you to a crawl. Get a REAL TNC. > > Radio and Phones; what's the link? > Some PBBSs, for a fee, will patch through your transmission to a telephone > line, enabling your radio to be connected to various services. This is very > useful if you need to access an online service while in the middle of nowhere. > No fees may be charged for any service in the Part 97 regulations I have and have read. You may not use a telephone under any conditions where you can complete the call by toll. Long distance calls may not be made by phone patch. > Conclusion > Packet Radio is good. > > d8-< > -- > > Again this was posted on my bbs, I do not use packet and don't think I > will. 2 technical at the moment. Hope this is informative to all who read it. > I made sure his addresses were in the header. > It is very enlightening and somewhat true in respect to license, how it transfers data, but looks a little old with mention of the PK232. > > /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ > < Disclaimer: per usual, all opinions are my own and not neccesarily > > < those of an employer or any other person or thing, living or dead. > > <----------------------------------------------------------------------------> > < Michael R. Pierre Pierre@ecs.umass.edu > > <----------------------------------------------------------------------------> > < Culture for service; > > < service for humanity. > > \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | INTERNET: lairdpg@lub001.lama.edu | Interstellar thought - Build a widget | | FIDONET: 1:3811/360@fidonet.org | while tickling Mickey mouses' ears | | The HAM Connection 1-409-833-1795 |----------------------------------------| | 14.4K V.42BIS/V.32BIS - DEDICATED TO AMATEUR RADIO/ 73's es cul de N5UYH | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep8.212716.1528@lub001.lamar.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!uw-beaver!rice!lub001.lamar.edu!lairdpgReferences:
<18363.2aa646b4@ecs.umass.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!uw-beaver!rice!lub001.lamar.edu!lairdpg From: lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu Newsgroups: comp.bbs.misc Subject: Re: Info Post on Packet Radio. Message-ID: <1992Sep8.212716.1528@lub001.lamar.edu> Date: 8 Sep 92 21:27:16 +1700 References: <18363.2aa646b4@ecs.umass.edu> Organization: Lamar University - Beaumont Lines: 168