🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <KRAUS.92Sep29101128@orchid5.rtsg.mot.com> kraus@rtsg.mot.com (David Kraus) writes:
>On Tue, 29 Sep 1992 00:29:49 GMT, arumble@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Anthony Rumble) said:
>> radel@bach.udel.edu (Todd Radel) writes:
>
>>>		       * A fidonet mailer
>>>			 (Binkleyterm, rfmail?)
>> Binkleyterm = Forget it..
>
>Why?  The last version list I looked at (granted, this was about 6 months
>ago) listed a BinkleyTerm port to UN*X.  I've been thinking of looking for
>it, but haven't had the time.
>
>I'm just wondering why you're dismissing it out of hand.  I know that the
>code leaves something to be desired, but there's lots of that around.

I managed to ftp the BinkleyTerm UNIX port (or, at least, *a* BinkleyTerm
UNIX port) from somewhere in Germany.  The code is a mess:  the very first
file wouldn't compile.  I may attempt to play with it, but as my
knowledge of serial comm. under UNIX is extremely limited (well, actually
nonexistent) I probably won't get very far.  :-(

-- Todd


-- 
Todd Radel                   | "I obscenity in the milk of all," Agustin said,
CIS/English undergrad        | "if it does not seem like a lunatic asylum in
University of Delaware       | here." -- Hemingway, _For Whom the Bell Tolls_
A.I. duPont Institute, 1600 Rockland Road, Wilmington, DE  19899