Article View: comp.bbs.misc
Article #669Re: Windows 3.1 and BBS software
From: Steve.Withers
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 12:05
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 12:05
41 lines
2876 bytes
2876 bytes
In article <1992Dec30.211530.28662@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> knight@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Knight Before Christmas) writes: > >|> I am basically looking for some BBS package that runs CORRECTLY under > >|> MS Windows 3.1 enhanced mode. I'd prefer to use Maximus BBS, which I > >|> am most impressed with, but it only works under standard mode. > > > While I was waiting for a firmware upgrade to a new harddrive controller > > which didn't like QEMM/Desqview, I ran my Wildcat 3.55P BBS (2 nodes) under > > Windows 3.1 for a while (one local node, one com port locked at 19200 with > > a V32bis modem, and a BinkleyTerm mailer frontend). While I can't say I > > particularly loved the speed of the sessions (I was, after all, running > > on only a 386DX-20), It was an acceptable stop-gap until I could run Desqview > > again. Frankly, I'd recommend Desqview, as it's friendlier to comm-intensive > > applications, and you can run Windows (albeit in standard mode... never tried > > it in enhanced mode) from within a Desqview session). > > Although Desqview is very good with telecommunications, it really is > hard to use with packages such as Borland C++ IDE and such. Admittably, > I'm not so hard pressed to use the BBS computer these days since I > got the new machine, but the 486-50 is a household favorite and my 33-386 > never gets used (it also has the 180 watt stereo and 15" loudspeakers > on it -- you haven't lived if you don't have a soundcard.) OS/2 v2.x is an excellent platform for what Kevin is trying to do. There is an OS/2 version of Maximus that does the job very well. You would need at least 6 megs with OS/2 v2.0.......though the upcoming V2.1 runs better in less memory. I have the beta for OS/2 2.1 running pretty well on a 386DX/25 with 4 meg of RAM on a PC at work. There are several BBS's here in Wellington running Maximus on OS/2. The nice part about is the vastly superior multi-tasking of OS/2 over Windows. This shows especially when dealing with modems and comms programs. DOS comms run OK under OS/2 but native OS/2 programs are definitly superior to anything around for smooth multi-tasking - like Maximus for OS/2. Steve -- Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand | Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz | Space for rent. +64 4 478 4714 | -cheap rates, nice location. **** Happy user of OS/2 v2!! **** |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan1.120522.28801@actrix.gen.nz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!Steve.WithersReferences:
<1992Dec30.211530.28662@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!Steve.Withers From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz Subject: Re: Windows 3.1 and BBS software Organization: Actrix Information Exchange Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 12:05:22 GMT Message-ID: <1993Jan1.120522.28801@actrix.gen.nz> References: <1992Dec30.211530.28662@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> Sender: Steve.Withers@actrix.gen.nz (Steve Withers) Lines: 41