Thread View: comp.bbs.misc
8 messages
8 total messages
Started by E2KP
Sat, 19 Dec 1992 15:01
RoboBoard BBS
Author: E2KP
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 15:01
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 15:01
40 lines
2718 bytes
2718 bytes
Well - I suppuse such a suggestion would upset all the Waffle BBS types here who enjoy comlicated interfaces because they deter inexperienced users, however, I was wondering what the reaction has been around here to RoboBoard BBS. For those of you who don't know, RoboBoard BBS is a full EGA/VGA graphi cal BBS package with a freeware term. It uses a proprietary graphics standard, allowing the use of icons and a mouse over the term. The icon language in particular allows for much faster and pixel edited graphics as opposed to draw box fill here stuff the NALPS proposes (though it does that too). The package has not been without some bugs, but is only four months old so some patience here is required. It will run all ansi doors, although there are not as of yet any Robo specific doors out yet. It has an excellent draw package and icon editor - thus allowing for greater ease of use than currently avail NALPS packages. It does not allow users to log on with anything less than the term for it or EGA/VGA graphics, although it will automatically prompt a user to dl the term package if that happens. It utilizes a Hudson style message base and dorinfox.def drop file, all owing it to be used in a BBS carousel program for silmultaneous use wit RA/SBBS/QBBS for example. I will be willing to post this package on a ferw ftp sites for those wh are curoious. IT is breathtaking and looks very much like Windows. TO many of you i suppose that is not a great advantage, although it sounds like in some places around the world where RA and SBBS are getting bori ng it would be a breath of fresh air. The debate over excluding mono users and old commodore/amiga/mac types has been done to death on Fido, with the only concensus being that old programmer types are shocked while newer users with newer equipment are quite happy and couldn't care less. Let me know and i will ftp to your chosen site. Please try to choose something that is not so off the wall that others don't know where to f ind it. Would be very interested in hearing reactions from at least those who at least view it locally (speed is not that much worse remotely). And if the Waffle types could contain there enthusiasm for colour for a mom ent and stay with the tour it would be helpful...:) ____________ Robert Trifts <E2KP@UNB.CA>
Re: RoboBoard BBS
Author: Scott Sturgis
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 17:42
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 17:42
21 lines
1536 bytes
1536 bytes
In article <19DEC92.11913785.0035@UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA> E2KP <E2KP@UNB.CA> writes: > users, however, I was wondering what the reaction has been around here > to RoboBoard BBS. > For those of you who don't know, RoboBoard BBS is a full EGA/VGA graphi > cal BBS package with a freeware term. It uses a proprietary graphics > standard, allowing the use of icons and a mouse over the term. The icon Here I believe lies the problem .. it uses PROPRIETARY graphics standard. I have looked at Roboboard, Darkstar and others. They are nice to some extent. But I think that most will be met with limited success until the bbs world comes up with some kind of UNIVERSAL graphics standard instead of PROPRIETARY standard. This goes back to the old scenario where the user has to have 16 comm packages on their machine...one for each PROPRIETARY system. I think the guys working on these systems are providing a valuable service in their research. But I think that once a common standard (or until some of the MAJOR players in BBS software agree on something) the majory will not adopt many of these.
Re: RoboBoard BBS
Author: Bill Fenner
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 18:11
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 18:11
12 lines
979 bytes
979 bytes
In article <19DEC92.11913785.0035@UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA> E2KP <E2KP@UNB.CA> writes: | It does not allow users to log on with anything less than the term for | it or EGA/VGA graphics, although it will automatically prompt a user | to dl the term package if that happens. Brilliant. Just what I want, when people with macs, amigas, commodores, ataris, terminals, and, oh yeah, a few PC's, call my board. Remember, folks, if you run an MS-DOS board, then no other hardware exists in the universe. Bill
Re: RoboBoard BBS
Author: Peter Busser
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 21:56
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 21:56
8 lines
595 bytes
595 bytes
E2KP <E2KP@UNB.CA> writes:
> It uses a proprietary graphics
^^^^^^^^^^^
> standard, allowing the use of icons and a mouse over the term.
^^^^^^^^
Just what we were waiting for, another proprietary ``standard''.
Re: RoboBoard BBS
Author: Michael Hackett
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 06:08
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 06:08
38 lines
2319 bytes
2319 bytes
On the subject of RoboBBS...well, I work in a sales and service computer shop and one of our salesmen runs a BBS, and just happens to be running RoboBBS. There's one other important feature that you need to know about besides the need for EGA/VGA...you also need to have a 16550 UART chip in your I/O card, or your connection won't be all that great, even if it's an MNP or V.xxbix connect. And the user front-end will squak if you don't have that 16550 UART. Now, on the other hand, if you have the VGA and the 16550 UART, it doesn't have too bad a thur-put even at 2400 baud. That itself, is impressive for the interface. If you've got a 9600 or 14.4k modem, you might think you're running something comparable to Windows. (No, I'm not kidding.) If you're interested in seeing what it looks like, and have the equipment; you can call up "The Goose's Nest" in Kansas City, MO at (816) 221-NEST and have a look at the interface. You will need to be able to download via ZModem to get the user front-end, though. (QModem should be able to do that.) Another think I'll add before I doddle off, RemoteAccess should be comming out with a similar product in a short while. I.E. a month or two. From what I understand, the maintanence is tough. If RA can do the same thing and cut the maintanence down... Well, anyway...if you check out the Goose's Nest, tell the SysOp that "Lionman" sent you. :-> "Be well..." Michael ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ Michael "Lionman" Hackett mdh@genco.bungi.com ~~ ~~ IMPORTANT: Most Emailers, don't grok my !-path address, therefore ~~ ~~ you need to use my id@node address to insure proper delivery! ~~ ~~ I really hate it when email goes missing. :-< ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: RoboBoard BBS
Author: Robert C. Merritt <rcmerrit>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 15:03
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 15:03
22 lines
1388 bytes
1388 bytes
In article <BzKL6I.K56@cs.psu.edu> fenner@postscript.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenner) writes: >In article <19DEC92.11913785.0035@UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA> E2KP <E2KP@UNB.CA> writes: >| It does not allow users to log on with anything less than the term for >| it or EGA/VGA graphics, although it will automatically prompt a user >| to dl the term package if that happens. > >Brilliant. Just what I want, when people with macs, amigas, commodores, >ataris, terminals, and, oh yeah, a few PC's, call my board. > >Remember, folks, if you run an MS-DOS board, then no other hardware exists >in the universe. > > Bill I run a MS-Dos board and I've TRIED to support other computers. Only Amiga owners every did anything to help their systems. I eventually gave up in frustration and only support Dos/windows/os2 machines now. Rob Merritt Opinions expressed here are mine alone.,
Re: RoboBoard BBS
Author: Wolfgang Johannes
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 17:05
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 17:05
8 lines
615 bytes
615 bytes
Hello all, tell me please, where can I FTPing the RoboBoard BBS? Did you upload it anywhere, yet? bye rzhwj@rz.uni-sb.de
Re: RoboBoard BBS
Author: Michael Hackett
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 15:09
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 15:09
22 lines
1572 bytes
1572 bytes
Here's an FYI, so that you know, for those people who are interested. RoboBoard BBS is now, (or should now be), in release as version 1.06a. If you are looking to install it for testing/evaluation/etc, be sure to get the a-version of 1.06. That version includes several bug-fixes of a couple of annoying problems... (Like keyboard-timeout message when coming back from a Door.) In addition, it should also be known that Seth is trying to have version 2.0 by the end of January. It's thought that version 2.0 will include both ANSI and VGA connect capabilites. But, I think we'll just have to wait and see how it comes out. "Be well..." Michael ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ Michael "Lionman" Hackett mdh@genco.bungi.com ~~ ~~ IMPORTANT: Most Emailers, don't grok my !-path address, therefore ~~ ~~ you need to use my id@node address to insure proper delivery! ~~ ~~ I really hate it when email goes missing. :-< ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads