Re: WafflineMail with Waffle 1.65..does it work?

Article View: comp.bbs.waffle

Article #3036

#3036

From: Christopher M. Camacho
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1993 07:29

22 lines
1325 bytes

andyross@infopls.chi.il.us (Andrew Rossmann) writes:
> 
> If you batch/unbatch in the background, make sure it generates a 'lock'
> file while it's running (mine is c:\spool\UUXQT.RUN.) It appears Waffle
> 
 the simpler solution would be, of course, to make the USENET and
LOCAL files read-only. this is what i've done here and it works much
better than trying to exclude lots of programs running together. when
you consider the volume of news i have, NOTHING would be able to run
and share those files.  :)

> --
> Andrew Rossmann            | Sysop of Infoplus BBS, +1 708 537 0247
> andyross@infopls.chi.il.us | Infoplus Support, latest version available
>  uunet!infopls!andyross    | by logging in as infoplus. [v32bis/v42bis]
>                       NO new taxes...NO new gambling


--
Christopher M. Camacho
cmc@mind.org            Fortress Development HQ
cmc@drake.eushc.org     Emory University Systems of Health Care

Technical Details

Message-ID: <iNiswB1w165w@mind.ORG>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!emory!uumind!cmc

References: <F7FRwB3w165w@infopls.chi.il.us>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!emory!uumind!cmc
From: cmc@mind.ORG (Christopher M. Camacho)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: WafflineMail with Waffle 1.65..does it work?
Message-ID: <iNiswB1w165w@mind.ORG>
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 93 02:29:17 -0500
References: <F7FRwB3w165w@infopls.chi.il.us>
Organization: Fortress Development HQ
Lines: 22

Reply to Parent Message