Article View: comp.bbs.waffle
Article #3050Re: HELLDIVER running with Win-OS2
From: Rhys Weatherley
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1993 22:15
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1993 22:15
47 lines
2816 bytes
2816 bytes
In <V6mqwB2w165w@berry.Cary.NC.US> pat@berry.Cary.NC.US (Pat Berry) writes: >First of all, let me apologize for frothing at the mouth the way I did. :-) That's ok. Thank God 1992 is over. 1993 can only be better ... :-) >That sounds marvelous to me, and more than I could have asked for. >Currently, I have a batch file that calls uucico and then uuxqt. I run >it when I'm ready to dial up my smarthost, send my outgoing traffic, and >receive any incoming stuff that might be waiting. I could just add a >line to the beginning to run the flush-into-Waffle program, right? That's right. I already have most of Helldiver Send ported to Windows now - I just need to do the bits to put messages into the temporary directory and write the flushing program. Really easy really: just replace the call to "spawnvp" with code to write the data to the temporary directory and recompile with Borland C++'s EasyWin. >> A native OS/2 version is a long-range possibility, but until I get more >> disk space, more memory, and a compiler, it will remain vapourware. A >> Windows NT version is more likely in any event, because that is my currently >> planned upgrade path. >But you'll need at least as much disk space and memory for NT, won't >you? More, from what I've heard. Either way, you still have to buy it. Yes, but since I've got all the tools for Windows, I've decided to stay on that stream for a little while longer. I have nothing against OS/2 (except IBM's feeble attempt to gain a monopoly again :-) - just a decision based on the large amount of time and money I have invested in Windows and that Windows apps can (more or less in Helldiver's case :-) be run under OS/2. >This brings up a related question, one that will probably get me nicely >flamed by Helldiver users everywhere. But I'll ask it anyway. Why are >you giving Helldiver away for free? A program this slick and >sophisticated is well worth a modest registration fee -- and it wouldn't I am thinking about it for a future version of Helldiver, but until it is stable and the bug and wish lists reduce I don't feel right about it (heck - a shareware author with morals - what is the world coming too? :-) . Cheers, Rhys. -- Rhys Weatherley, University of Queensland, Australia. rhys@cs.uq.oz.au "I'm a FAQ nut - what's your problem?"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11538@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!uqcspe!cs.uq.oz.au!rhysReferences:
<11535@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> <V6mqwB2w165w@berry.Cary.NC.US>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!uqcspe!cs.uq.oz.au!rhys From: rhys@cs.uq.oz.au (Rhys Weatherley) Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle Subject: Re: HELLDIVER running with Win-OS2 Message-ID: <11538@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> Date: 3 Jan 93 22:15:01 GMT References: <11535@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> <V6mqwB2w165w@berry.Cary.NC.US> Sender: news@cs.uq.oz.au Reply-To: rhys@cs.uq.oz.au Lines: 47 X-Newsreader: Helldiver Packet Viewer 1.00