Article View: comp.bbs.waffle
Article #3438Re: Offline Readers
From: Ranfry
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 17:14
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 17:14
47 lines
2747 bytes
2747 bytes
In <930107.083802.2H8.rusnews.w164w@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca> russell@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Russell Schulz) writes:
>ranfry@mala.proteus.qc.ca (Ranfry) writes:
>> Look will you people shut up! I have TOLD you what is needed, forget the
>which is: an offline reader for Usenet - right?
NO!, what I wanted, and asked for is a version of Waffline that
worked with Waffle v1.65 for when I picked up Waffline v1.0 it did not
seem to work.
>the issue is not that waffle is superior - the issue is that QWK is
>_incapable_% of handling the format used by Usenet since before QWK was
>invented.
BEEP! Sorry, but you are WRONG. The ISSUE is that I requested
a QWK message processor for Waffle and tons of people kept pushing Waffle,
the fact is that I USE Waffle but NOT all my users can. All of them CAN
use QWK formats.
>> don't want to set up a Waffle system, no matter how easy it is.
>over and over again, people say: right now, that's just your only option.
>Rhys is working on a new offline format for Usenet - do you think he'd have
>had to do that (and have people like me debate him in mail about it) if
>a (non-uucp/rnews/rmail) solution already existed?
BUT it ISNT the only solution, and if it was, then simply saying, can't be
done, or rather, hasn't been done would have been okay, but insulting me
for NOT wanting to push Waffle on my users is NOT exceptable. And that is
what many of you have done.
>just because you want QWK and Usenet to work together doesn't mean they
>have to. people saying something unpleasant over and over and over again
>can sometimes give you a clue that the world isn't yet perfect, or that
>the problem you have can't be solved within the specifications you lay out.
Ooh, thanks for the philiosophy lecture...NOT!
--
=========================================================================
Internet: Ranfry@mala.proteus.qc.ca | I was going to put
Genie: M.Lombart1 | something witty here,
UUCP: uunet!proteus!mala!ranfry | but could think of nothing
Mala's Refuge (514)748-8070 | so I won't bother!
=========================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gfwTrAKPBh107h@mala.proteus.qc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsflash.concordia.ca!clyde.concordia.ca!proteus!mala!ranfryReferences:
<W6uSrA7HBh107h@mala.proteus.qc.ca> <1icma8INNnse@gaia.ucs.orst.edu> <930107.083802.2H8.rusnews.w164w@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsflash.concordia.ca!clyde.concordia.ca!proteus!mala!ranfry From: ranfry@mala.proteus.qc.ca (Ranfry) Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle Subject: Re: Offline Readers Message-ID: <gfwTrAKPBh107h@mala.proteus.qc.ca> Date: 9 Jan 93 17:14:08 GMT References: <W6uSrA7HBh107h@mala.proteus.qc.ca> <1icma8INNnse@gaia.ucs.orst.edu> <930107.083802.2H8.rusnews.w164w@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca> Organization: Mala's Refuge, Montreal, Canada Lines: 47