Article View: comp.bbs.waffle
Article #3440Re: Offline Readers
From: Foster Schucker
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 23:06
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 23:06
54 lines
2784 bytes
2784 bytes
russell@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Russell Schulz) writes: > frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca writes: > > It took me about an entire evening to configure Waffle. Then another > > couple days to get everything working perfectly (cron, phone answering, > > polling, etc.). About a week to get things *real* nice -- external > > commands, ANSI screens, etc. > > is it just me, or are these features you're unlikely to be worried about > in an offline reader? (no matter what you call it) I'm suprised that it took 'another couple days' to get it working perfectly. When I set waffle up the first time it took about an hour. Setting up the news feed took a few messages back and forth to John (the feed sysadmin). So to set it up as a news reader should take the average person about six hours tops. > > CIM, on the other hand, took me a total of 15 *minutes* to configure. > > [if you pay me compuserve's rates, I'll write you a similar application > that dials your nearest pay-per-minute place.] this is about the only I use TAPCIS to call CI$. It took about as long to set it up as it did to get Waffle to work. There is a number of addons to TAPCIS to make it as useful as Waffle. And they also take time to install and configure. > > Yes, Waffle is powerful. But not everybody wants to run their own > > site. > > AGAIN with the analogies. From my point of view -- If you want a simple, the brain dead can install, easy to use system to give you access to the "net" then you use Waffle. If you want a complicated, custom, multi-bell and whistle system that will allow you to have multiple users dialed in with full net access then you use Waffle. The only difference is the amount of time that you spend in the configure time. :-) :-) :-) IMHO I'd rather have someone on the net that has spend some time working on what they are using. It cuts down on the BIFFS of the world. :-) :-) :-) And since I'm on a roll, 99% of the questions that I've seen in c.b.w about Waffle have been answered with a variation of RTFM. Maybe one of the native english writers out there could write the ultimate Waffle document: "Everything you MUST know about Waffle for those people who refuse to read the documents." Thanks for your time Foster Schucker (foster@nzkites.uucp) (1-215-458-8354 (voice))
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<mVB6wB1w164w@nzkites.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!udel!gvls1!tredysvr!nzkites!fosterReferences:
<930108.184748.3B4.rusnews.w164w@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!udel!gvls1!tredysvr!nzkites!foster From: foster@nzkites.UUCP (Foster Schucker) Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle Subject: Re: Offline Readers Message-ID: <mVB6wB1w164w@nzkites.UUCP> Date: 9 Jan 93 23:06:49 GMT References: <930108.184748.3B4.rusnews.w164w@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca> Organization: Kiteflyers Roost Lines: 54