🚀 go-pugleaf

fenner@postscript.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenner) writes:

> In article <mVB6wB1w164w@nzkites.UUCP> foster@nzkites.UUCP (Foster Schucker) 
> |Maybe one 
> |of the native english writers out there could write the ultimate Waffle
> |document: "Everything you MUST know about Waffle for those people who
> |refuse to read the documents." 
> 
> Unfortunately, that document would be as big as all the other documents
> combined; there really isn't a whole lot of stuff in the Waffle docs that
> is not useful to know.

True.  But the "way" some things are written in the present form seem
ambiguous.  For example, the part about signature files could be
explained better.

Foster's suggestion would be a document that targets those areas that
are otherwise poorly explained.  I think there is a FAQ section in one
of the .DOC (can't find where right now), but maybe that section can be
annexed with newer Q&A's.

-- /|ugust /|bolins -------------------------[ abolins@visavis.cam.org ]--