Article View: comp.bbs.waffle
Article #3512Re: Old XT + Waffle + Fossil + V.32bis = ?
From: Richard Hasting
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 23:59
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 23:59
52 lines
3003 bytes
3003 bytes
tcscs!zeta@src.honeywell.com (Gregory Youngblood) writes: > carlos@carlos writes: > > > In <LaL7wB1w165w@floor.uucp.risc.net> hp@floor.uucp.risc.net (High Priest) > > > > >Well, I would be happy with 1000 cps. I'm currently getting 400-500 cps > > >on a v.32bis connect from my feed. (UNIX machine) > > >The admin at my feed says there's nothing he can do, the 'g' protocol is > > >simply too inefficient. Is there anything that I can do? > > >450 cps on a 14,400 connect is pathetic. > > > > At times I peak at 500-600cps, but thats it.. > > > > If I would have known this little "fact", I may not have even started > > this.. Someone posted here recently a patch to change from "g" to > > "G" protocol. Maybe your site supports "G" and you might gain a > > speed increase.. > > These speeds from v.32 or v.32bis connections usually indicate some type of > data compression is being used, i.e. MNP-5 and/or v.42bis, and that you get > large volumes of news. Large enough to matter at least. If your not using > v.42bis or MNP-5 then this won't help and I dont know what else might work > for you. > > Disable MNP5 and V.42bis before calling a UUCICO session (this can be done > easily in the DIALERS section). When I did that I consistantly get throughpu > of 850 to 900 cps receive and 550 to 650 cps when sending. This is with 'g' > protocol and the standard packet sizes and windows sizes. > > Greg > > .-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-. > . TCS Consulting Services P.O. Box 600008 St. Paul, MN 55106-0008 . > . ..!srcsip!tcscs!zeta ..!src.honeywell.com!tcscs!zeta . > .-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-. Try again Greg. Compression (v42.bis or MNP-5) can reduce the throughput by about 100-150 CPS. I happen to know that what they are seeing is caused by having the window size set to "3", and moving to 7 will move the speeds up to a more appropriate range. I have a 9600 connection which often gets 900 CPS (v.32 and v.42bis, data is compressed) using the 7 windows, and with 14.4, I get 1200 (v.42bis turned on) to 1340(v.42bis off). Why do I know this? I had this problem for the longest time. It is likely that the USENET feed's uucico does not allow for more than 3 windows, and this is the problem. Have them look at getting a better uucp. (Good luck...:-) Richard Hasting Richard Hasting, Computer Literacy 2000 Project Office richard@kunikpok.icus.com "When all is said and done, more is said than done."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<NigaXB2w165w@kunikpok.icus.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!icus!kunikpok!richardReferences:
<e1s0wB1w165w@tcscs.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!icus!kunikpok!richard From: richard@kunikpok.icus.com (Richard Hasting) Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle Subject: Re: Old XT + Waffle + Fossil + V.32bis = ? Message-ID: <NigaXB2w165w@kunikpok.icus.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 17:59:58 CST References: <e1s0wB1w165w@tcscs.UUCP> Organization: Kunikpok Kennels and Komputers (Pet Project) Lines: 52