🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.bbs.waffle
2 messages
2 total messages Started by Mark Buckaway Sun, 24 Jan 1993 03:35
HELP: Status line disappears in Waffle for DOS
#3165
Author: Mark Buckaway
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 03:35
22 lines
1418 bytes
Does anyone else have the problem whereby the top status line disappears when
the screen is scrolled. The status bar is reclaimed when the screen is cleared
by the data on the status line is lost and whatever text happened to be there
is kept from scrolling.

Note, this happens on three different machines and the VIDEO selection in the
STATIC file makes no difference. Also, this occurs with or without and ANSI
driver.

This is extremely annoying as I have no idea who is every online. My rumaging
through the source code has turned up nothing other than it appears Tom is not
trapping all the necessary DOS/BIOS calls required to keep the status line on
the top of the screen. This problem make me feel like re-writing the DOS.C
file from scratch using only Borland's CONIO functions....

Help! Anyone?
Mark

----
Club InSaNiTy BBS   |   BBS:+1 416 691 0679 |   root@cibbs.UUCP
DataSoft Consulting | Voice:+1 416 691 5529 |   uunorth!cibbs!root
Mark Buckaway       | Toronto, Ont. CANADA  |   1@4653 (WWIVnet)
Re: HELP: Status line disappears in Waffle for DOS
#3200
Author: Thomas E. Dell
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 00:39
18 lines
1312 bytes
>Does anyone else have the problem whereby the top status line disappears when
>the screen is scrolled. The status bar is reclaimed when the screen is cleared
>by the data on the status line is lost and whatever text happened to be there
>is kept from scrolling.

>This is extremely annoying as I have no idea who is every online. My rumaging
>through the source code has turned up nothing other than it appears Tom is not
>trapping all the necessary DOS/BIOS calls required to keep the status line on
>the top of the screen. This problem make me feel like re-writing the DOS.C
>file from scratch using only Borland's CONIO functions....

No, it is not as simple as that. If you did this, anyone with a CGA
(and certain other kinds of video cards) would kill you. CONIO is incredibly
slow under those circumstances. What we have now (a mix) is a compromise
that's the fastest on average for all systems. But it still isn't perfect on
all systems (ie, yours.)

--Tom
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads