Thread View: comp.bbs.waffle
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Steve Frampton
Sun, 13 Feb 1994 22:29
Pagesat & DOS - an oxymoron?
Author: Steve Frampton
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 1994 22:29
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 1994 22:29
46 lines
2903 bytes
2903 bytes
Hello: Is it possible to interface the Pagesat system with DOS Waffle? I am still vague at this point on the finer points of the Pagesat system, but the following is how I envision it to work. I would appreciate pointers from existing PageSat DOS users, especially if you use Waffle. Bare-bones slow 386 (16MhZ) with about an 80MB drive handles the sat feed. I assume the feed is always coming in, so I don't expect this machine to do much else. The above machine is connected via 2 Mb/s Lantastic network to a faster 386 with a huge hard drive (250MB for now, but hopefully a 450MB to 1GB soon). This faster machine will be running Waffle. Once every set interval (say, 15 minutes or 1/2 hour), Waffle will simply copy the files from the Pagesat computer via LAN and then delete them over there. Waffle will then perform batching for other sites, expiration, etc. Thoughts: - The Pagesat computer will be a perpetual data machine. Since data will be retrieved and deleted from it's hard drive on a frequent basis, I assume the 80MB drive will meet my needs. - I am concerned with duplicate news-items. Not so much with Waffle storing a crossposted article in different locations, but with what I assume will happen with multiple feeding of groups (eg. this post, cross-posted to comp.bbs.waffle & biz.pagesat, would arrive in the c.b.w. feed and be copied to /comp/bbs/waffle and /biz/pagesat, and then would arrive in the b.p. feed and be copied to /comp/bbs/waffle and /biz/pagesat -- leaving 4 articles where only 1 was intended). - Is it a simple matter to configure the Pagesat computer to only receive a selection of groups, or must all newsgroups be retrieved and then the ones not in a system file immediately deleted? - This should be a DOS-based solution. Linux is fine but I don't think it offers Lantastic support(?). I am a bit concerned -- though excited -- about the prospect of dealing with a continuous stream of news! :-) Your thoughts appreciated. Thanks in advance. ---< MAKE MONEY FAST! Contact Dave Rhodes for details. >--- Steve Frampton E-mail: <frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca>
Re: Pagesat & DOS - an oxymoron?
Author: Eric Poole
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 1994 17:46
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 1994 17:46
41 lines
2620 bytes
2620 bytes
In article <0ZiPHc1w165w@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca> frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca writes: > The above machine is connected via 2 Mb/s Lantastic network to a faster > 386 with a huge hard drive (250MB for now, but hopefully a 450MB to 1GB > soon). This faster machine will be running Waffle. Once every set > interval (say, 15 minutes or 1/2 hour), Waffle will simply copy the files > from the Pagesat computer via LAN and then delete them over there. > Waffle will then perform batching for other sites, expiration, etc. No reason I can think of why this should not work. However ... To do this, you will have to configure the Pagesat machine as a LANtastic server. In my experience (I run LANtastic/AI here), a LANtastic server will give priority to external accesses over local accesses, so that if external accesses are heavy, speed of locally-running applications slows to a crawl. So, if you are in the process of copying a bunch of the latest news over to the Waffle machine, the Pagesat machine may well slow down to the point that it might start getting data overruns. Also, LANTastic Server uses a lot of memory. You may or may not be able to load it high. I think you will be better off if you can configure things so that the Pagesat machine is a workstation and not a server, and let the Pagesat machine take care of copying things over to the Waffle machine. If you can do that. In any case, it's something to make a note of and keep in mind. Hope this helps ... . . . . . ep . <--------------------------------------------------------> . > Eric Poole epoole@leotech.mv.com < . > NETIS Public Access Internet 603-432-2517 (data) < . > Londonderry, New Hampshire 14.4Kbps V32bis 8-N-1 < . <-------------------------------------------------------->
Re: Pagesat & DOS - an oxymoron?
Author: Steve Frampton
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 1994 00:32
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 1994 00:32
15 lines
1418 bytes
1418 bytes
epoole@leotech.mv.com (Eric Poole) writes: >I think you will be better off if you can configure things so that the >Pagesat machine is a workstation and not a server, and let the Pagesat >machine take care of copying things over to the Waffle machine. If >you can do that. In any case, it's something to make a note of and >keep in mind. Nice tip...how long do you have between sat batches to do this? How long does a pagesat dump take for the entire newsfeed? Thanks... --< Anybody know a site where I can FTP the Pelican Brief? >-- Steve Frampton E-mail: <frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca>
Re: Pagesat & DOS - an oxymoron?
Author: Jack Kilday
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 1994 01:26
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 1994 01:26
83 lines
5293 bytes
5293 bytes
In article <0ZiPHc1w165w@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca> frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca writes: > Is it possible to interface the Pagesat system with DOS Waffle? I am > still vague at this point on the finer points of the Pagesat system, but > the following is how I envision it to work. I would appreciate pointers > from existing PageSat DOS users, especially if you use Waffle. It's a cinch. The PageSat comm program creates standard uncompressed news files with the extension of .BAG --- news0001.bag, news0002.bag, etc. You need only pick each of these up with RNEWS, e.g., RNEWS < news0001.bag. I've written a free utility I call PageNews which waits for a .bag file to be created (or will process all if invoked on a directory full of 'em) and invokes RNEWS on each. When there is nothing to do, it simply sits there giving back CPU cycles to DESQview. > Bare-bones slow 386 (16MhZ) with about an 80MB drive handles the sat > feed. I assume the feed is always coming in, so I don't expect this > machine to do much else. I run the receiver program on a 5th comm port added to my BBS machine a 486/33 running a 4-node PCBoard system (with Waffle and ZipNews as doors). The current PageSat news feed runs at approximately 1200 characters per second, so the comm port is opened at 19,200. We're keeping only about 180 news groups of the total feed, so a small JUNK directory located on a RAM drive keeps the load on the machine quite light. (This may change if I order the planned 3-gig Micropolis SCSI-2 soon. <g>) > interval (say, 15 minutes or 1/2 hour), Waffle will simply copy the files > from the Pagesat computer via LAN and then delete them over there. > Waffle will then perform batching for other sites, expiration, etc. I have a 2nd, back-up machine, a 386/16 to which I sometimes switch the feed (via several A-B switch boxes) such that the feed piles up on that box if the BBS machine is down for whatever reason -- disk backups, or if it's pressed into other service temporarily. I also can leave things in the 2-machine configuration when both are operating, in which case the finished news files are shipped across to the BBS machine (continuously) via null modem cable. The back-up machine also runs under DESQview and normally has one DV window dedicated to PageSat receiving and a second for pre-processing the news and shipping it over via the null modem. Other DV windows are used for various odd jobs I may do from time to time, without impacting the feed, or losing interrupts, etc. (16550 UARTs are required, however.) I suspect anyone could get away with a fast '286 as such a "back-up" machine. > - The Pagesat computer will be a perpetual data machine. Since data will > be retrieved and deleted from it's hard drive on a frequent basis, I > assume the 80MB drive will meet my needs. More than enough. > - Is it a simple matter to configure the Pagesat computer to only receive > a selection of groups, or must all newsgroups be retrieved and then the > ones not in a system file immediately deleted? Yes, you can do this. The pre-processing I mentioned above essentially does this. I use a FIDO utility called Dovemail to use a listing of newsgroups (separate from your USENET file) as the basis for discarding unwanted newsgroups. So, when running in the 2-machine configuration, I can send across for processing by RNEWS news files that contain only only articles for the groups that I carry. > - This should be a DOS-based solution. Linux is fine but I don't think > it offers Lantastic support(?). As you've noticed, not even LAN support is needed to do the job. > I am a bit concerned -- though excited -- about the prospect of dealing > with a continuous stream of news! :-) I still marvel at my PageSat system being paid off so rapidly. I formerly averaged over $125 per month for just the UUCP news portion of my long distance phone bill. And now, when I see a 225K file come thru from some newbie on comp.bbs.misc, etc., posting his latest find to the world, I can sit back and grin (no more elevated blood pressure) as I imagine the flames about to be directed his way from the long distance UUCP sites. :) -- Jack Kilday | jkilday@nlbbs.com The Northern Lights BBS | -=- 207-761-4782 (v.32bis/HST) | 4-Nodes, 700 Megs * Internet: UUCP, FTP, Telnet
Re: Pagesat & DOS - an oxymoron?
Author: Keith Smith
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 1994 01:43
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 1994 01:43
24 lines
2019 bytes
2019 bytes
In article <frampton.311.761272369@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca>, Steve Frampton <frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca> wrote: >epoole@leotech.mv.com (Eric Poole) writes: > >>I think you will be better off if you can configure things so that the >>Pagesat machine is a workstation and not a server, and let the Pagesat >>machine take care of copying things over to the Waffle machine. If >>you can do that. In any case, it's something to make a note of and >>keep in mind. > >Nice tip...how long do you have between sat batches to do this? How long >does a pagesat dump take for the entire newsfeed? The stuff comes in continously all day and all night long. It rarely stops for over a minute or two. IMHO the best way to run this thing is from the likes of a Linux type freeware box with minimal hardware doing SAT + NEWS and only that. C-News by itself on a full feed is pretty intense. I think people lose concept at times at how much stuff is in a FULL newsfeed plunking 60+ MB a day at you. You can fill up a Gig disk in a very short time span if you don't expire regularly. -- Keith Smith keith@ksmith.com 5719 Archer Rd. Digital Designs BBS 1-910-423-4216 Hope Mills, NC 28348-2201 Somewhere in the Styx of North Carolina ...
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads