Article View: comp.bugs.2bsd
Article #34Re: Question re inodes
From: Keith Bostic
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1989 15:25
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1989 15:25
19 lines
1465 bytes
1465 bytes
In article <2999@tahoe.unr.edu>, ed@tahoe.unr.edu (Ed Wishart) writes: > This is not a bug, just a question that I don't know where to post. > The 2.10 BSD file system uses 64 byte inodes containing 40 bytes > of address space. They use only 21 of these bytes for access to > data blocks, 4 of these being direct addresses. Why waste this > space when there are addresses left over that could be used to > access more direct blocks? Don't know if Casey (Leedom) still reads this group or not -- he might remember better than I do. Anyhow, the problem is that 2.9BSD had that particular piece of wrongness in it, and fixing it meant Changing The File System. Given how tough that is to do and how well-tested the conversion tools have to be, we talked each other out of fixing it. Anyhow, a quite reasonable "fix" for 2.10BSD would be to use those blocks. Of course, if you're going to change the file system, the 3-byte inode compression should also be ripped out. --keith
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<31593@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bosticReferences:
<2999@tahoe.unr.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bostic From: bostic@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU (Keith Bostic) Newsgroups: comp.bugs.2bsd Subject: Re: Question re inodes Keywords: inodes, 2bsd, file system Message-ID: <31593@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 29 Sep 89 15:25:34 GMT References: <2999@tahoe.unr.edu> Distribution: usa Organization: University of California at Berkeley Lines: 19